This week offered another insight into how little it takes to be blocked in China. Ren Zhiqiang, a highly influential businessman and commentator, offered a mild criticism of President Xi Jinping’s campaign to tighten control over state-run media. The result was the the government blocked him from Internet sites for spreading “illegal information” and having a “negative impact.” The result of being blocked by sites like Sina Corp.’s Weibo and Tencent Holdings Ltd.’s QQ was the loss of access to more than 37 million followers on Weibo alone. Of course, his complaints are meritless since the chief censor of China announced recently that there is no censorship in China . . . and he should, after all, know. He is the chief censor.
Ren is the former chairman of Huayuan Property Co. and remains chairman of Beijing Huayuan Haoli Investment Co. Notably, he is also a close friend of the Communist Party’s discipline chief Wang Qishan. He told Bloomberg News in an interview last year that the two make frequent phone calls and meet a few times every year. Ren posted his views after Xi went on a chilling tour of media outlets warning journalists and editors that criticism would not be tolerated and that all of their writings must “reflect the will” of the party and “preserve the authority of the party.”
Ren responded with a post on his Weibo account criticizing the president’s assertion that the state media serve the party when taxpayers fund its budget. He asked “When does the people’s government turn into the party’s government?” That’s it. That is all it takes. The posts were deleted and now Ren has been effectively deleted.
In addition, government media has accused Ren of “anti-Communist Party” thought — as if the Chinese system (with a record number of party-connected billionaires) is a true Communist nation. China is more appropriated viewed as an authoritarian system held by a ruling class — a red aristocracy.
History, however, has shown that censorship rarely maintains a regime and that truth, like water, has a manner of finding a way out. Indeed, the crackdown of the Chinese regime on lawyers, public interest advocates, and journalists reflects a deep seated fear that it would take little for the public to ignite and then unite in opposition.
5 thoughts on “Chinese Businessman Questions Government Crackdown on the Media. . . The Government Immediately Cuts Off His 37 Million Followers”
At least in China they confronted the target of censorship. In the United States there is not an official notification that your content has been censored.
The U.S. censorship model is closer to the Cold War era East German Stasi where the communist officials never admitted to censorship and blacklisting citizens – denying legal standing to victims so judges couldn’t provide oversight.
China and the United States are like two ships passing in the night and only one of us is headed in the right direction. The Chinese people may be a long way from realizing true freedom but at least they are headed towards it.
What’s up with the L on Romney’s forehead?
That rigid indicates something is amiss. Revolution in sight?
Sooo, China’s “establishment” has some Mitt Romney types who want to bust out the guy who is popular with the people??? Whocuddanode???
Oh, that’s a segue for my latest piece of political art. (Shameless self-promotion, I know. But I thought this was cute, what with the Omar Khayam allusion thingy. . .)
Comments are closed.