Academia, Bizarre, Politics, Society, Uncategorized

Georgetown Professor Again Triggers A Firestorm of Controversy With Hateful Anti-Republican Comments

Georgetown_sealDr. Carol Christine Fair, an associate professor in the Security Studies Program at Georgetown, has created a firestorm of controversy after she called for the castration and “miserable death” of Republican senators. This is not her first such controversy in profanely attacking Republicans.

We previously discussed Fair tirades against Republicans.

Fair is clearly upset with the ongoing Kavanaugh hearings but took the event to a bizarre extreme.  She posted:

“Look at [this] chorus of entitled white men justifying a serial rapist’s arrogated entitlement,” she wrote. “All of them deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps. Bonus: we castrate their corpses and feed them to swine? Yes.”

199 thoughts on “Georgetown Professor Again Triggers A Firestorm of Controversy With Hateful Anti-Republican Comments”

    1. The net effect of that will be to provide some fee income for the counselor.

  2. I also do not understand why the left’s tirade against “old white men” is not racist? But in addition your “fair” professor also called for the mutilation of Republican men’s corpses after they are murdered. Sweet lady. Like the anti-Semitic professor from Chicago who railed against Zionism in profane terms before reporting to work at his new job and got fired (and rightly so).

    Any professor who advocates for murder and mutilation on Twitter or elsewhere should be placed on leave pending proceedings to terminate their employment, and in the meantime donors should vote with their checkbooks (as in the Chicago case).

  3. Whose sons and daughters get to be the guinea pigs in Dr Fair’s class to see if she snaps, and kills and maims them? Shall we just let other parents send their kids to her, and wait and see what happens?

    The bias against conservative students has reached the pit of threats to their safety. This is what we, as a people, allowed to infest in our education system, from preschool to grad school.

  4. Agree with Professor Turley that she should not be censored much less terminated. While some may not agree with her language (1) free speech is not limited to civil language; and (2) everyone has a right to make fools of themselves. As long as she does treats all students fair and equal, she has a right to express her own personal opinions.

    1. Why not terminate her? She’s a teacher, not a lumberjack. Her viewpoints are not irrelevant to job performance.

    2. If she was Klan would there be no problem with her teaching black kids? This isn’t seeking a safe place from opposing ideas. It’s threats of violence.

  5. I think that all speech is not alike. For example, suppose Fair had said:

    A: “I think Trump is an idiot, and I believe Stormy Daniels!”

    Would anybody be calling for her to be fired?

    What if she said instead:

    B: “I want to see all Republicans dead, and their guts pulled out and made into cello strings! Then, their corpses burned, and their bones ground into cement to make houses for the poor!”

    See. I think one of those statements has entered into cray-cray land, and would be a good reason for her to be fired. Sooo, where on that spectrum does this fall:

    “All of them deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps. Bonus: we castrate their corpses and feed them to swine? Yes.”

    IMHO, fire the crazy b*tch.

    Squeeky Fromm
    Girl Reporter

  6. Go ahead de-platform her. Whose next?
    If the good Professor hadn’t mentioned her and her spew I’d probably never come across her and if I did I’d chuckle and move on to something else. The pendulum always swings both ways. Don’t like her content too bad change the channel. If she has open threatened members of congress then they should investigate.
    I don’t don’t currently send any tuition dollars to G-Town so the effect is zilch.
    See a steaming pile of Dog crap, step into it at your own peril.

    1. If the good Professor hadn’t mentioned her and her spew I’d probably never come across her and if I did I’d chuckle and move on to something else.

      How very Kristallnacht of you.

      First they came for the Jews
      and I did not speak out
      because I was not a Jew.

      Then they came for the Communists
      and I did not speak out
      because I was not a Communist.

      Then they came for the trade unionists
      and I did not speak out
      because I was not a trade unionist.

      Then they came for me
      and there was no one left
      to speak out for me.
      Martin Niemöller

      1. Seriously?
        How panzy ass of you to give some low life professor at a reasonably upper class institution who happens to teach a somewhat insignificant part of their ciriculum the weeight of the National Socialist Party of the previous century.
        You all of people shouldn’t be cowering to this insignificant anonomoly of attention seeking educator.
        Shame on you SIR.

        1. Conservatism is the greatest RUSE EVER.

          Oops! Your Lefty slip is showing.

          Seriously?

          Yes, seriously. If we were only talking about 1 low-life professor at some non-descript CC in Flyover county USA, then I would still be outraged and speak out. Because as we have seen, we are no longer speaking about 1 professor, at 1 CC in Nowhereville, USA. This has infected the most prestigious universities with well-known and respected professors. This has infected multiple government agencies and political institutions. The most recent example being the Senate where they want to deny the presumption of innocence to a conservative.

          You all of people shouldn’t be cowering to this insignificant anonomoly of attention seeking educator.
          Shame on you SIR.

          Damn you Lefties certainly project a lot. You spineless twit, if you and your fellow Lefties had the stones (and principles) to denounce this and any other professor out there making such pronouncements, then they wouldn’t have such fertile soil to grow in.

          Shame on you!

          1. The point is I’m not a Lefty. How is supporting the first amendment rights of people who say things I disagree with some how inherently “Lefty”?

          2. Maybe these people need attention like it’s crack. Do you realize how much our host the good professor has given this woman as afar as a world wide platform to elevate her bombastic sewer drivel?
            Maybe they just need to be ignored.

    2. Conservative students can’t change the channel. This kind of rhetoric is getting more and more violent on college campuses across America. Changing schools can impact their graduation.

      Now that parents are aware that Georgetown supports this kind of terrorist threat to conservatives among its staff, then they can make decisions on where to send their kids accordingly. But there are students already there. There are conservatives already in her class.

      1. Terrorist threat?
        For people that claim inaelable rights you sure know how to conveniently deny them to someone who happens to be exercising theirs.

          1. What does the right of an instructor at a university to say unhinged things on social media have to do with other unhinged people physically threating US senators outside of the capitol?

        2. Conservatism is the greatest RUSE EVER.

          What’s interesting is you fancy this statement has a coherent meaning.

          1. So what I have figured out is that you went to Berkley, studied economics and worked for a medical facility. You fancy yourself a knuckle rapping Nun, Sister Mary Stigmata like creature that posesses the ultimate and final comentary on all things social.
            Please go sit in your corner. Your diaper needs to be changed. DDS, TSTD, you need to reveal yourself or you will be just destined to old crank for eternity.

            1. Bob Ueckerlele – what I have figured out is that you suck at figuring things out. That’s okay. I blow it on occasion, too. 😉

              2. Paul, at some point you have to say enough is enough when it comes to lampooning people because you can’t communicate with them. I never thought that I’d be on the recieving end of your derision. I just get tired of peoiple attacking the delivery of some commentators other than the content. I have to admit that I’m going to reevaluate you going forward for your cheap shots.
                This is all about allowing someone to speak their mind but obviously it’s not.
                Sorry I suck.

                1. Your content sucks too. You’ve been attacked not because anything you say went over anyone’s head, but because you were obnoxious and your points were stupid.

                2. Bob Ueckerlele – are you familiar with the Big I, little i theory. The Big I is all the things that make you uniquely you. The little i’s are the things you do, like car mechanics, speed racing, acting, participating in a marathon, etc. None of the little i’s reflect on the Big I, which is the unique you. That is the important thing. So, you should not take it seriously. Should Trump take it seriously when SNL lampoons him? No really, because they will be on to a different target next week.

                  However, for the record, I thought your evaluation was wrong and I said so. Still, I am a tiny cog is a very large machine.

            2. Bob U.: Not a chance that bitter geezer studied economics at Berkeley or any other top university. He just sits at his keyboard, unwashed, unshaven, in his crusty underwear spewing forth hate for anyone who doesn’t think he is important, which is virtually everyone.

      3. The irony is that based on yours and Olly’s response to my post that you have become pseudo helicopter parents for those poor “conservative” students that just can’t cope wid da mean ol nasty professor. I am laughing my ass off right now at how shrill and hypocritical you both sound.
        Sound familair to you two?

        1. Nice try. The students in question are what are known as ‘paying customers’. The professor in question is what as known as ‘shoddy services’.

          1. DSS – actually, she might be quite good at her job, just a hack at dealing with white male conservatives.

            1. she might be quite good at her job,

              And I am Marie of Roumania.

        2. Young folks I talk to are forewarned against this. I chill their free speech and told them not to believe the Lie that in America you can think whatever you want. I told them that the Leftist social engineers and their lumpen shock troops run the gamut in university and that they would be on the lookout for anyone who is a Trump supporter, a Republican, or even just generally normal human opinions.

          I warned them no matter what you think about race, never talk about it
          I warned them no matter what you think about feminists, never tell the truth
          I warned them no matter what you think about immigration, never reveal.

          I warned them that every invitation to “honest dialogue” is a trick to get them to reveal their own internal opinions to the PC Inquisitors. They dont care what you think, they just want to know if you think the wrong thing so you can be put on an enemies list.

          so young folks, never be tricked; hold the truth in your heart and say whatever lies they want you to in order to get a good grade.

          When you get out and get power, then you can be a mastermind. But don’t go off half cocked in the meantime. Don’t go beserk. Stay in line, be the grey man.

          I said truth does not matter to these people, only power. And so don’t waste your breath on truth, only get the grades so you too can have power. To survive and thrive and stand apart and not get sucked into any phony causes. That’s our dasein, and it includes the unconcealment of things, and likewise their concealment as well.

          But if things jump off, and go hot, they know which side they are on. Believe me.

    1. Noooooo! Not the GI Joe! That fiend! Clearly a thief cannot be allowed to sit on the Supreme Court.

  8. While Dr. Fair’s Twitter account has been suspended, the focus is on John J. DeGioia, President of Georgetown University. It isn’t over. The lawsuits get pricey in this area.

    Did Dr. Fair do the tweeting on Georgetown campus & use Georgetown laptops, desktop computers, cell phones, wired & wireless networks while on the clock & being paid a salary from Georgetown University?

    1. Is she a threat to conservative student safety?

      She said she does not ask students’ political opinions. What would she do if she realized a conservative student stood before her? It will happen eventually. Do we wait for a student to get hurt or killed first?

      If this was the other side, there would be massive campus protests shaming her. But conservatives are on their own.

      Ben Shapiro should audit her class with armed security to test how she would react to a known conservative in her class.

      1. Hint: President of Georgetown University, John J. DeGioia will understand what collateral damage is.

  9. “I still believe that this is an exercise of free speech and there is no indication that Fair is unfair to conservative students“
    1. If she kills students one day the school will be sued out of business because she has a history of threatening conservatives. Allowing her access to conservative students is reckless endangerment.
    2. These seem like the rantings of a mentally ill, violent person, which is a general safety issue on campus.
    3. If she threatened black people, women, or LGBTQ would this be handled the same?

    As a business owner, an employee’s actions that damage the reputation of the company, jeapordizes the safety of clients, or otherwise impacts profit will face consequences.

    As a parent, I would be too afraid for my son’s safety to send him to a school that continued her employment. What are they waiting for? Her to actually murder and mutilate a conservative student?

    It is time to have a frank discussion about mentally unstable professors.

    1. It is time to have a frank discussion about mentally unstable professors.

      It’s time to have a frank discussion about academic tenure and corporate governance in academe. What should happen is that the university trustees meet next month and vote to terminate her, handing her a severance package and having security frog march her off the campus. Then they appoint outside counsel to conduct an investigation of the process by which she was hired and tenured. The outcome of such a process should include Consequences, the most severe being that the program is dissolved and all its faculty terminated.

      You want to fix higher ed, you have to have outsiders in charge who go Kenesaw Mountain Landis when this sort of thing happens.

      1. I oppose tenure, especially in K-12 but even in universities, too.

        Someone protected from firing like the tenured can engage in the most egregious conduct, essentially wagging their fingers at you. It is cliche nowadays that teachers will boast that parents can complain all they want; they’ll never be fired. Even pedophile teachers are allowed to retire because it takes years in court and hundreds of thousands of dollars to fire them, thanks to the unions and tenure.

        Tenure was supposed to protect academics in higher education, to enable them to push the envelope and write about unpopular ideas. Perhaps there can be academic protections written into their contract, but complete tenure protects what’s wrong.

        Universities are a business, and their product is education. They need to be accountable for the quality of their product and employees.

        1. What happens in higher education is that the faculty get the idea into their head that they own the place. The priority in the institution is to please the faculty. (The faculty do not see it that way because their capacity for dissatisfaction is limitless).

          1. they’re something like a mafia and the tenured professors think they are made men

            they pay about as much in taxes compared to their revenues as the mafia does too. which is to say, a little, not much, compared to what they have coming in and hidden under their mattresses

            my plan would entail ending their NFP status altogether and making them pay their fair share

  10. More evidence of academic neutrality from Dr. Might-Be-Fair:

    “F— Trump and f— you for voting for him,” Fair wrote on Tumblr. “What AMAZES me about Trumpanzees … apart from the fact that they are a bunch of Xphobic, women-hating, white supremacist, whiney-ass snowflakes who love a criminal traitor …”

    On Tumblr, Fair has also dubbed MAGA hats “socially-acceptable Klan hoods that say ‘I heart White-Male-Christian Supremacy.’”

    No reason for your conservative male students to worry. None at all.

    Fair does say “I do not ask them their opinions about contemporary politics in class.” Another non-denial, denial and of course, who needs to ask about anyone’s political proclivities in these days of social media billboardery!

    https://www.foxnews.com/us/anti-trump-georgetown-professor-goes-on-profane-tirade-against-kavanaugh-gop

    1. They don’t give a rip about the general run of their students. Any discipline of her will be undertaken for one reason only: she’s an embarrassment interfering with their marketing.

    2. What would she do if a student wore a MAGA hat?

      The Left increasingly uses violence to terrorize conservatives.

      It is common for conservatives to be too afraid to wear any clothing supporting Trump or Republicans in public. They would be assaulted. Can you imagine if Democrats were too terrified to wear Hope and Change clothes?

      But nowhere is the fear more prominent than on university campuses. Conservatives must hide their views or they will get punished academically, which would ruin their careers. They will be harassed and threatened, often by the professors themselves.

      America is in an existential fight against the Fascist Left.

      1. What would she do if a student wore a MAGA hat?
        ***************

        Why you’d do what you have to do to stop the Klan. Her comments are an apology for “righteous” violence. You can see the same type of rhetoric (though in a much more refined mode) in the Antebellum South:

        “Well, Sir, what if the decision of this body shall deny to us this high constitutional right, not the less clear because deduced from the entire body of the instrument, and the nature of the subject to which it relates, instead of being specially provided for? What then? I will not undertake to decide. It is a question for our constituents, the slaveholding States—a solemn and a great question. If the decision should be adverse, I trust and do believe that they will take under solemn consideration what they ought to do. I give no advice. It would be hazardous and dangerous for me to do so. But I may speak as an individual member of that section of the Union. Here I drew my first breath; there are all my hopes. There is my family and connections. I am a planter—a cotton-planter. I am a Southern man and a slaveholder—a kind and a merciful one, I trust—and none the worse for being a slaveholder. I say, for one, I would rather meet any extremity upon earth than give up one inch of our equality—one inch of what belongs to us as members of this great republic! What acknowledge inferiority! The surrender of life is nothing to sinking down into acknowledged inferiority!

        I have examined this subject largely—widely. I think I see the future if we do not stand up as we ought. In my humble opinion, in that case, the condition of Ireland is prosperous and happy—the condition of Hindostan is prosperous and happy—the condition of Jamaica is prosperous and happy, to what the Southern States will be if they should not now stand up manfully in defence of their rights.”

        ~ Sen. John C. Calhoun (Speech on the Introduction of His Resolutions on the Slave Question, February 19, 1847)

        1. JC Calhoun a political theorist and politician of equal importance in our history to the Founders, and also a Yalie.

        2. Of course, the Founders omitted and, thereby, excluded any and all restrictions and limitations on secession making secession, a natural and God-given right of all states and nations, fully constitutional. Secession was an action the Founders had conducted against the British Empire.

          Invasion of a sovereign foreign nation by Lincoln was unconstitutional as were the suspension of Habeas Corpus and any proclamation not issued under condition of legal war, insurrection or rebellion; secession being none of which.

          Understanding that the pen is mightier than the sword, it was always thus, that cotton and slavery and any and all other products and means of production must have been opposed through the employment of the tools of freedom and free enterprise such as promotion of ideas through free speech, boycotts, divestiture, etc.

    3. dont wear maga hats. don’t let anybody know your stance when you are young and they want to ID your sympathies. lay low and hide like the serpent but not the kind that gives any warning before it strikes. easier to deliver the punishment and slither away unharmed. that’s my advice to the young men.

      1. Like most everything else, the Left has not thought this all the way through. They have no idea what would be unleashed on them once the Right abandons all principles to fight back on the Left’s terms. Despite every advantage available to the Left, and despite them using every unscrupulous means imaginable, they are still barely able to move the needle. I picture Foreman (Left) getting rope-a-doped by Ali (Right).

  11. Speaking of the whole #metoo witch hunt stuff:

    ———

    Atticus Finch Was on the Wrong Side
    By Rich Lowry

    October 2, 2018 6:30 AM

    Gregory Peck as Atticus Finch in To Kill a Mockingbird (via YouTube)
    In today’s #BelieveAllWomen environment, due process isn’t what it used to be.

    It’s time for To Kill a Mockingbird to give up its treasured place in American culture.

    The 1960 novel by Harper Lee was published to instant acclaim, has sold more than 30 million copies, and is ubiquitous in high-school curricula. The 1962 movie version, starring Gregory Peck, is a classic in itself and won three Academy Awards. A play based on the novel is about to open on Broadway.

    This is quite the résumé for a book that, prior to the publication of a sequel in 2015 that was really the first draft of To Kill a Mockingbird, was Harper Lee’s only work. But nothing is forever, even for a book commonly called “timeless.” Lee’s novel is deeply out of sympathy with a moment when on college campuses, and in the culture more broadly, due process isn’t what it used to be, when it is often thought to be a hateful act to insist that allegations of sexual misconduct be proven.

    A refresher on the story: It is told from the perspective of a young girl, Scout, who is the daughter of a small-town lawyer named Atticus Finch (played by Peck in the movie). The setting is Depression-era Alabama. Finch is unpopular in town because he has decided to take on the defense of a black man named Tom Robinson who is accused of rape by a young white woman.

    And this is where the story, in contemporary terms, goes off the rails. Atticus Finch didn’t #BelieveAllWomen. He didn’t take an accusation at face value. He defended an alleged rapist, vigorously and unremittingly, making use of every opportunity provided to him by the norms of the Anglo-American system of justice. He did it despite considerable social pressure to simply believe the accuser.

    In a gripping courtroom scene, Finch cross-examines Mayella Ewell, the 19-year-old daughter of an abusive drunk from a dirt-poor family who is Robinson’s accuser. With all the vehemence and emotion she can muster, Ewell insists that Robinson attacked her after she got him to break up a piece of old furniture at her house.

    Without mercy, Finch takes apart her account. In contemporary internet argot, he “destroys” her. He brushes right by her tears. He doesn’t care about her feelings, only the facts. He exposes contradictions in her story and shreds her credibility, especially with the dramatic revelation that Robinson doesn’t have use of his left arm when he stands up at the defense table (he is alleged to have hit her with his left hand).

    It is revealed that Ewell is lying. She had made an advance on Robinson and gotten caught by her vicious, racist father. The charge of rape against Robinson was a cover story, although the bigoted jury convicts him anyway.

    To Kill a Mockingbird stands firmly for the proposition that an accusation can be false, that unpopular defendants presumed guilty must and should be defended, and that it is admirable and brave to withstand the crowd — at times in the story, literally the lynch mob — when it wants to cast aside the normal protections of justice.

    Exactly what has made Atticus Finch such an honored figure in our culture would make him a very inconvenient man at many college campuses today, where charges of sexual misconduct are adjudicated without the accused being allowed to confront the accuser or make use of other key features of our system of justice. Finch is a rebuke to the shift from a presumption of innocence toward a presumption of guilt that now attends accusations of sexual harassment and assault. He didn’t believe that someone’s being accused of something is enough to establish his wrongdoing, or accept that a category of people were, by definition, to be under a pall of suspicion.
    Comments

    Atticus Finch is not the man for this moment, but we need him, and his reasoned yet unshakable commitment to fairness and justice, more than ever.

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/10/atticus-finch-was-on-the-wrong-side/

    ——-
    Squeeky Fromm
    Girl Reporter

      1. Great clip! Maybe if Mayella had the advantage of three days in a car with lawyers prepping her, she could have pulled off the whole “Pretty Pose” thing like Christine.

        Squeeky Fromm
        Girl Reporter

        1. “Great clip! Maybe if Mayella had the advantage of three days in a car with lawyers prepping her, she could have pulled off the whole “Pretty Pose” thing like Christine.”
          *****************************
          Maybe so but Mayella has got the hair flip thing down, though.

      2. mespo! Well. I swanny! It is she….because, think about it. Have you ever seen the two of them together?! 🤣
        Great find, mon ami.

      4. That’s right, ol’ Tom Robinson was as innocent as O.J. Just another falsely accused honor student. 😹😹😹

  12. I had not heard of this professor before but clearly since she is threatening our senators the FBI needs to investigate HER. I feel bad for the graduates getting brainwashed with hate in our colleges. The left is trying to make a war on white men, that’s for sure. But only Republican ones, and older ones, it seems.

  13. What makes it different is that even though they are personal accounts, they are publicly accessible. If she were shouting these things in the middle of a cafe, she’d be kicked out, if not arrested.

    1. hbd Chick’s twitter account has also been suspended, because reasons.

  15. 1. Why do we rely on higher education to sort the labor market? We got along passably without that in 1928 except for a discrete menu of professions.

    2. Why are private institutions publicly-subsidized?

    3. Why is corporate governance in higher education so ineffectual that faculty fancy they are the institutions proprietors?

    What we need to do is to take their subsidies and their privileges away from them. Let the bloodbath begin.

  16. Prof. Turley calls attention to this, while the ordinary run of faculty and the ordinary run of higher education apparatchik studiously pretend it isn’t happening. Now this is what is not acknowledged.

    1. She passed through alll the recruitment screens in higher education to get where she is. She was accepted at a graduate program, passed the courses, completed a dissertation and persuaded her advisor and two others to sign it, got the recommendations she needed to be hired somewhere, landed a tenure track position, didn’t step on enough toes for her department or the provost to want to get rid of her, persuaded referees and editors to publish her papers in sufficient quantity that her supporters in her department could prevail over any adversaries. Remember what KC Johnson’s department head said, “We need a woman. A woman we can live with. Not someone who needs therapy as much as she needs a job”. Well, being a head case is no bar to academic employment.

    2. Note that arts and sciences faculty, as well as certain occupational faculty (law, social work, and teacher-training) is chock-a-block with people who fancy adhering to the nexus of views common in the Republican Party is ipso facto an indication of unsuitability for the teaching profession. You’re not ‘well-informed’, you’re ‘anti-science’, &c. This woman is distinguished by her emotional disorders and her expressiveness. This does differ from most academics, who tend to be like David Benson – smug, supercilious, and shifty.

    3. With scant doubt, had she spoken this way of any of the universitiy’s mascot groups, the provost would have done a dumpster dive through the faculty handbook to find an excuse to fire her and taken the hits necessary in subsequent negotiations with counsel. Higher ed apparatchiks never go to trial on any issue, btw.

    4. An ancillary note: Georgetown was founded by the Society of Jesus. Remember when Cdl. Arinze was booed at Georgetown for affirming Church teaching on sex and family life, which included exhibitionistic displays by the equivalents of this woman on that faculty in 2004? The Jesuits haven’t the manpower to run the institutions they founded, and their numbers in North America (if they’re fortunate) will sink to fewer than 500 in the coming decades. (There were about 10,000 in 1965). And, of course, the residue of the Society of Jesus has as its charism single-malt scotch and sodomy.

    1. DSS – I wonder if Chrissy tried her “I’m just a widdle girl so don’t hurt me” when she was defending her dissertation? I used to wear a T-shirt that said “Ye tho I travel through the Valley of Death I shall fear no evil, Because I am the Meanest Son-of-a-Bitch in the Valley” to all my graduate exams.

        1. Cindy Bragg – well, I passed every test, so I must have scared every test. 😉

    3. Tabrook…..good comment…… although, our daughter went to Loyola (N’ Orleans) It’s Jesuit, right? But she liked the priests….Her major was French and her French prof was an Italian priest from Brooklyn! I think compared to the rest of N’Orleans, as far as morality, Loyola NOLA behaved.

    4. Jesuits: the only greater glory they serve now is their own.
      They’re shamelessly secular, that is, until they send out the donations to sucker alumni and then they make a big deal out of their Catholic bona fides. It’s a big con. They should be sanctioned by Rome. They were sanctioned in the past and for good reason. But I won’t hold my breath– considering the Capo di Tutti Capi now is one of them.

    5. Ol’ Pillory sure has a bug up his ass when it comes to instructions of higher learning. Tenure denied, maybe? 😹😹😹

      2. Kitty Wampus, but a moment finds the Wikipedia page about her. It states she is a Provost’s Distinguished Associate Professor. So certainly has tenure. Learn to do a little research before just spouting, hmm?

        1. Huh? David, My comment was about Pillory, DSS, Tabborack or whatever the Hell he’s calling himself today. Whenever educational institutions are mentioned, he goes on these long, monotonous screeds about universities and their faculty and academe and blah blah blah about how terrible they all are. He has an ax to grind, and it’s pointing to him being a grad student wash-out or tenure denied kicked to the curb loser.

            1. Paul- No, as I stated in previous posts, I work on the Hill, as a Congressional staffer in D.C. I earned my degree and then moved on to the real world. I did work one summer in a fast food restaurant as a teen. But I don’t spend hours posting disparaging comments about the fast food industry and everything that is wrong with it and how it should be reformed. As stated, I moved up and on.

              1. I’m sorry you work in the Swamp. But, at least you get a nice paycheck.

                I am sure at least 1 or 2% of DC Swamp denizens should not be tarred and feathered, and really serve the people.

                1. Mr Kurtz – are you sure the number is that high? Maybe 0.5% is a more realistic number for salvation from the swamp. 😉

          3. Except he or likely she is exactly correct about the rotten corrupt ivory tower.

            One can be spiteful, yet accurate.

        1. No, Mr. Kurtz, I don’t particularly care about institutions of higher learning. I got my degree as quickly as I could and got out of there. I think universities are over-priced and should focus on education, not partisan politics, but beyond that, I don’t care. I do get annual solicitations from my alma matter, and make sure that my donation is earmarked for student scholarships only, and cannot be used to contribute to administrative bloat or faculty pet projects.

  18. A daily diet of Satinism from what was
    The extreme left now is main stream.
    A new vicious cult is emerging.

  19. At what point does it become an issue between expressing free speech and wishing someone harm.

  20. “a f—ing death cult.” Kind of humorous that the side that supports how many dead babies? resorts to calling the other side a death cult. Miss Fair, the AR15 has nothing on planned parenthood when it comes to killing the innocent.

    1. I don’t see the right harassing Liberal students across America, keeping their invited speakers out, threatening them on campus, seeking and destroying any small business with a Liberal ideology, chasing Liberals out of restaurants and screaming at them in the street, “Occupying” anything and leaving it a wreck with human feces and dirty needles that costs a million dollars to clean up.

      For the most part, it’s the Left. I’m sure there is a Republican somewhere, somehow, that is acting like a jack&(*, but there is no comparison with the mainstreaming of threats of violence of the Left against the Right in most avenues of our society.

    2. she knows what an AR 15 is huh? Cool. I also like plastic 22s. That’s a good piece for a lady. Think she can handle the recoil? LOL

    3. Nobody is innocent, you moron. Fetuses have original sin from the moment of conception.

        1. Jim22 – it has been a long time since Catholic school, however, I vaguely remember original sin comes with birth.

          1. Paul – Your catechism instructor must have been a drunk. The Revised Baltimore Catecism, 4th ed, p. 54 states: “The Blessed Virgin Mary, through the merits of her divine Son, was free from the guilt of Original Sin, and this privilege is called her Immaculate Conception. She is the only one of the whole human race who enjoys this great privilege, and it is called her Immaculate Conception, that is, she was conceived – brought into existence – without any spot or strain of sin on her soul, and hence without Original Sin.”

            1. Kitty Wampus – I am older than the Revised. You have to go back to what it was in 1948.

Comments are closed.

Res ipsa loquitur – The thing itself speaks

Discover more from JONATHAN TURLEY

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading