The police arrived but found neither Cooper nor the man were present.
It is not clear if Cooper would be charged though it is unlikely. She clearly clearly suggesting an imminent attack and says falsely that Christian Cooper is threatening her. Section 240.50 allows a charge for anyone who “initiates or circulates a false report” or, “gratuitously reports to a law enforcement officer or agency…an allegedly impending occurrence of an offense or incident which in fact is not about to occur.” However, such a charge might deter other people from calling police when they are in fear of an attack.
Cooper, 41, later apologized for the incident in a phone interview with NBC New York. She also returned her Cocker Spaniel to a rescue shelter where she adopted him a couple years ago. According to Heavy.com, Christian Cooper, 57, is a former Marvel Comics editor who graduated from Harvard and now works as the senior biomedical editor at Health Science Communications. He is an avid bird watcher.
Amy Cooper is a vice president and head of investment solutions at Franklin Templeton Investments in New York City and a native of Canada. She received a degree in actuarial science from the University of Waterloo in Ontario and a master’s in business administration in analytical finance at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business in 2009.
We have addressed an array of such incidents, including social media controversies involving academics. In some cases, racially charged comments have been treated as free speech while in others they have resulted in discipline or termination. It is that lack of a consistent standard that has magnified free speech concerns. We have previously discussed the issue of when it is appropriate to punishment people for conduct outside of the work place. We have followed cases where people have been fired after boorish or insulting conduct once their names and employers are made known. (here and here and here and here and here and here).
The fact is that Franklin Templeton has now been drawn into the controversy by association. This case does not raise the type of political speech that we have previously discussed as a growing concern. This is not political speech but an unhinged and deeply disturbing use of what Christian Cooper called “the race card.” Courts are likely to support employers in holding employees accountable for such controversies.
1,379 thoughts on “Executive Loses Job and Dog After Tirade Against African American Bird Watcher [Updated]”
“The Unnecessary Rehabilitation of Amy Cooper”
by Megan Reynolds
Over Memorial Day weekend, a video depicting an act of casual and cruel racism circulated widely on Twitter. In the video, an aggrieved white woman confronts the man holding the camera, dragging a cocker spaniel by the collar in one hand as she advances. “I’m asking you to stop,” she says. “I’m calling the police. I’m telling them there is an African-American man threatening my life.” The interaction goes on for a minute or so, and thankfully never escalates. Her voice grows sharp as her unfounded panic increases: “I’m being threatened by a man in the Ramble, please send the cops immediately!”
The confrontation ends once the woman clips the leash to her dog’s collar, which was all the man wanted. In the face of what could’ve been a life-threatening altercation, the man remains calm.
Since the video’s spread the woman in question, Amy Cooper, has been the subject of intense public scrutiny, and the facts of her past have been dredged up as a means of explaining her behavior. She issued a mealy-mouthed public apology that attempted to grapple with her own privilege as well as her latent racism: “When I think about the police, I’m such a blessed person,” she told NBC 4 New York. “I’ve come to realize especially today that I think of [the police] as a protection agency, and unfortunately, this has caused me to realize that there are so many people in this country that don’t have that luxury.” Following the incident, the dog, Henry, was briefly returned to the rescue organization Cooper had adopted it from. Cooper also lost her job at investment firm Franklin Templeton. Christian Cooper (no relation), the man who was her target, stated quite plainly in an interview with the New York Times that the encounter itself wasn’t the problem, it simply illustrated the racist impulse that Amy Cooper, and many like her, operate from.
“It’s not about her,” he told the Times. “What she did was tap into a deep vein of racial bias.”
There are lots of veins that were tapped here and racism is only one.
Far too many people miss the fact that a lone woman in the park was threatened by a big man. And then had her life ruined because she did not dot all the politically correct i’s as she sought to protect herself.
Women were once again sent Stokley charmicheals message “the only position for women in the movement is prone”
Do not presume because there were no protests and few spoke out that women did not get the message.
Your safety is subordinate to political correctness.
More recently on CNN a left wing nut woman spoke the quiet part out loud.
If you call 911 and there are not police to save you from the burglar or rapist.
be quiet and think about your priviledge.
“Amy, Amy, Amy…”
It seems anonymous is still wrestling with the amy issue even though no one stated she was a nice person. Anonymous wants to make sure he gets one last punch at a person he has never even met. Sort of sick.
This also occured BEFORE the park, and we had heard this claim before.
I do not have a good opinion of either Amy or Christian
John, As I have stated over and over again, I don’t find either one acted well. It was a small incident blown out by those that have rage and wish to push the false idea of tremendous racism in this nation.
Amy, Amy, Amy…
“Central Park ‘Karen’ Amy Cooper reportedly tried to have her doorman fired”
What has been left out of this article, is what triggered Amy in the first place. Quoting Christian in his first interview with Erin Burnett on CNN’s Outfront, “Before I started the video recording, I said: ‘I’m going to do something that you are not going to like, and you cannot stop me.’ ” Meaning that he was going to offer the dog a doggie treat. The purpose of that is, that dog owners typically put their dogs on a leash and leave the area, as they assume that the treat will harm the dog. If he actually said it like that, Amy might, in the heat of the moment, have mis-construed this as a threat to harm her personally.
All the more reason for Amy to leash the dog and make a beeline out of the Ramble. If she had truly been afraid, she would have retreated, but she approached CC — angry that he was recording their encounter…
Read the article posted at 9 am yesterday.
“All the more reason for Amy to leash the dog”
That is what she did.
” and make a beeline out of the Ramble. ”
Everyone should have retreated.
“If she had truly been afraid, she would have retreated, but she approached CC — angry that he was recording their encounter…”
Amy should have retreated. People under stress do not always make the best decisions.
Rayshard Brooks Should not have fought with police officers, He should not have taken one officers taser, he should not have fled, he should not have fired the taser at an officer. The officer should not have shot back.
Brooks is now dead. That should not have happened.
Almost all the time we can find things people should have done differently to get a better outcome
The question is not did Amy or Christian do everything optimally, But what did they do wrong. Was that illegal ? Criminal ?
She apparently left before the police arrived. Does it make any sense at call to call 911 and then take off…?
People make lots of choices that do not make sense.
Chritians threat makes no sense.
Christian clearly made a threat. But the threat was not specific. Amy can assume that Christian means harm to her dog or herself. While that may not be the case, the nature of the threat permits that perception.
Comments are closed.