Jimmy Kimmel is back on television by less than popular demand. Kimmel’s ratings are hardly robust (Kimmel pulls in 1.85 million in comparison to Gutfeld! at 3.2 million). Still, his suspension for spreading disinformation about the killer of Charlie Kirk became a cause celebre on the left. Kimmel continues to air nightly screeds against Trump and conservatives. Of course, he is hardly unique in appealing to an echo-chambered audience. However, this week Kimmel showed children being read Eric Trump’s book by a drag queen. What was most disturbing was not the use of the children to echo talking points on how great drag queens are, but showing them throwing Trump’s book into a wood chipper. It appears that nothing is funnier for the modern left than a good book burning or chipping.
Trixie Mattel led the “Drag Queen Storytime” with a group of kids in the satiric treatment of Trump’s book. Mattel asked the kids questions like “Do I scare any of you?” eliciting a response: “You just look amazing. Why would that be scary?”
The children are given choices to read like Collectible Spoons of the Third Reich.
It may be the most bizarre element of the skit, even bordering on the ironically humorous. After all, Mattel was portraying the Trump Administration as Nazis, but was about to show the children how to destroy books that have views that they do not like. That may not bring back memories of collectible Nazi spoons, but it does bring back memories of Nazi book burning.
The audience delights as one child says that she would “kick” Donald Trump “in the…” before the show bleeped out the rest of her response.
Mattel then shows the kids how to “make excellent confetti” out of a book that they do not like with a giant wood chipper outside of the studio. It is the type of comedic styling that would have had Joseph Goebbels rolling on the ground laughing.
For the free-speech community, there are few more disgraceful images as the burning or destruction of books because you do not agree with the author’s viewpoints. To see children participating in such an exercise is even more troubling.
It is easy to dismiss this as simply another bizarre skit on a show struggling for ratings. However, some of us have been raising concerns for years about the embrace of the American left in effective (or even actual) book burning. Some on the right have also embraced book burning.
Cancel campaigns of conservative speakers were not enough for many on the left. They have pressured companies not to publish books by conservatives, including figures like Justice Amy Coney Barrett. It is far easier (and environmentally sound) to ban opposing books than to physically burn them. However, the sentiment is the same. Rather than responding to those who oppose you, you fight to silence them and prevent others from reading them.
Books by JK Rowling have been burned because of her opposition to certain transgender policies that she views as undermining women’s rights.
That is why the image of children happily tossing books into a wood chipper is so disturbing for many in the free speech community. This is not just satire but reality as many push to destroy books with opposing views.
None of this means that there is any crime in this comedic sketch. Even book burning is protected speech. Yet, the humor is missed by many of us who have been objecting to the rise of a new generation of self-righteous book burners in America.
The inclusion of a picture of a Nazi book burning implies equivalency. Why else include it?
It is equivalent to shredding books as a means of pushing ideological conformity.
It is hilarious reading all you stupid Anon’s arguing with one another. Please make up an identifiable alias name so we can keep which moron is posting what.
It would be like a 1970s dystopian fiction movie like Logan’s Run
if you only have rights if you have talent (a subjective thing, anyway).
Why the hell are constitutional scholars, of all people, suggesting such a thing?
What constitutional scholar is suggesting that? Where? Give a quote or STFU, liar.
They are not suggesting anything of the kind. Liar.
Yes, they are.
Specify who you are talking about, and give a link, or STFU.
Meanwhile a staffer for the Chicago City College system said at a “no kings” protest that ICE agents must be “shot” and “wiped out.”
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/watch-no-kings-protester-steps-up-mic-calls-ice-agents-shot-wiped-out.amp
Kansas elder — Don’t believe anything on Faux Neuz. It only provides infotainment, being derived from a movie studio company.
Professor, it was on other news sources. I saw the video. Open your mind a little. You might learn a thing or three.
Fox is not left wing, that’s why liberals hate it and refer to it as Faux Neuz. Plus as a professor you should know the weakness of ad fontes arguments … like saying the parent corporation is a movie studio somehow disproves the content of the article.
Then cite another, more reliable news source, please.
oldman may not know of any other news source. He lost the clicker in the sofa years ago and the TV has been stuck on that one channel ever since.
It’s on VIDEO you fool. That is proof.
Professor:
https://dailycaller.com/2025/10/20/no-kings-protester-ice-agents-shot-wiped-out/
If you click the above it has an embedded video. Take a look and judge for yourself rather than just deny deny deny.
Kansas Elder — Thank you.
David the child. Grow up
So david. If it’s on video.. That’s NOT proof.
WOW
Kansas Elder, kindly give me such other new source.
Quit trying to sound clever. You just sound decrepit.
“. . . derived from a movie studio company.”
You might want to update your internet.
Fox sold that division to Disney eight years ago.
Should be arrested as possible danger to himself and others pending psych eval.
Why do people call out trump and his sycophants nazi and fascist?
Maybe because that is how they self identify.
Trump’s nominee to lead the Office of Special Counsel, told compatriots in a group chat that he has “a Nazi streak.”
That a person should not have constitutional right to free speech if they are unpopular (as is implied) does not seem like the kind of position that a true free speech advocate would take.
That is not stated or implied anywhere. Liar.
Yes, it is.
OT: Another Trump win in the courts following Supreme Court victories and higher level courts. This show the lower leftist courts not only failed but provided ideology instead of justice.
BREAKING: APPEALS COURT RULES TRUMP CAN SEND NATIONAL GUARD TO PORTLAND, MARKING SIGNIFICANT WIN FOR PRESIDENT
The divided Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a lower court order that blocked Trump from deploying Oregon National Guard troops to the West Coast city.
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/appeals-court-rules-trump-can-send-national-guard-portland-marking?utm_source=breaking&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter
Exactly where does legislation and/or a court obtain the authority to usurp and exercise executive power?
Chief Justice Taney acknowledged his limitations.
Some may not like it, but no legislation or court decision may exercise executive power that it does not possess.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Article 2, Section 1
The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
TANEY TO LINCOLN
“The clause in the Constitution which authorizes the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus is in the ninth section of the first article. This article is devoted to the Legislative Department of the United States, and has not the slightest reference to the Executive Department.”
“I can see no ground whatever for supposing that the President in any emergency or in any state of things can authorize the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, or arrest a citizen except in aid of the judicial power.”
“I have exercised all the power which the Constitution and laws confer on me, but that power has been resisted by a force too strong for me to overcome.”
– Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, May 28, 1861
“TANEY TO LINCOLN”
Same Chief Justice Taney who said “TANEY TO LINCOLN: “Dredd Scott is a black farm animal just like his slave owner’s horse, and definitely not a human being. I have exercised all the power which the Constitution and laws confer on me”
– Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, March 18, 1857
Among constitutional scholars, Scott v. Sandford is widely considered the worst decision ever rendered by the Supreme Court. Chief Justice Roger Brooke Taney’s opinion for the court was arguably the worst ever written. He ignored precedent, distorted history, imposed a rigid rather than a flexible construction on the Constitution, ignored specific grants of power in the Constitution, and tortured meanings out of other, more-obscure clauses.
Pretty obvious why GeorgeX, our Confederate Kluxxer Democrat constitutional scholar, has a deep and abiding law affair with Chief Justice Taney and loves him Taney’s Kluxxer version of the Constitution.
Winner, winner.
You can burn a flag if it is is your own property, but you cannot shred a book if it is your own property?
This is inconsistent.
. . . but you cannot shred a book if it is your own property?
Reading comprehension problems? The professor said the exact opposite. I’ll quote for your sorry ass:
None of this means that there is any crime in this comedic sketch. Even book burning is protected speech.
You’re really that much of a moron and want to broadcast your idiocy to the world, eh?
Then why did he bring it up?
Then why does he state “it does bring back memories of Nazi book burning.”
Why is there a picture of a Nazi book burning?
Only an idiot would equate the shredding of a book to Nazi book burning.
They are completely different.
One is personal property of a private citizen.
The other is the state confiscating private property for destruction.
Not the same.
The distinction you cite has nothing to do with the topic of the article. The topic of the article is using the destruction of books to further an ideology. Your response was:
. . . you cannot shred a book if it is your own property? This is inconsistent.
So even you recognized that the identity of the books’ owners was irrelevant, as you said nothing about that in your initial comment. Now that you were revealed as having responded without even reading the article, you’re blatantly sea-lioning as a way of deflecting from your ineptitude. Newsflash: it won’t work. We see you for the idiot you are.
That’s not the reason the Nazis burned books. They did this in celebration of the arrest and jailing and eventual transport to concentration camps of their owners where they would endure torture before being killed. Do you think they bought them at the local bookstore just for the occasion?
Would Kimmel be happy if they were burning books on how to treat Tetralogy of Fallot? This might result in Kimmel’s search for relevance… in a world that has all but left him behind… or a behind as the case may be?
Would Kimmel be happy if they were burning books on how to treat Tetralogy of Fallot?
Thank you for elevating the discourse several IQ points above the current median of this forum.
I remember well when Jimmy K begged, cried, was on bended knees for help and then gratitude because Americans showed him empathy and support. I have been disappointed and shocked at Jimmy Kimmel’s arrogance considering his son’s condition will need continuous monitoring. He has alienated half of the country and yet his son might very well depend on a physician or cardiac nurse who comes from the very audience he has angered. Dumb, dumb, dumb.
Arrhythmias in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
Arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death remain common in repaired tetralogy of Fallot and affect even those with excellent anatomic repairs. Atrial arrhythmia often has mechanisms different from those in acquired heart disease. Ventricular arrhythmia remains a major source of mortality in repaired tetralogy of Fallot. Noninvasive risk stratification is important to identify patients who may benefit from ablation or primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Multiple noninvasive risk factors are associated with ventricular arrhythmia, but no universally accepted risk stratification algorithm exists. The mechanism of ventricular arrhythmia is usually attributable to a consistent and discrete set of slowly conducting anatomic isthmuses related to both the native anatomy and the consequences of the surgical repair, which interact with ventricular remodeling to provide arrhythmic substrate. This substrate can be identified during electroanatomic mapping and prophylactically ablated in appropriate patients. This scientific statement discusses the mechanisms and treatment of arrhythmia in repaired tetralogy of Fallot.
Krieger, E.V., et al. (2022). Arrhythmias in repaired tetralogy of Fallot: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 15(11), p.e000084.
” He has alienated half of the country and yet his son might very well depend on a physician or cardiac nurse who comes from the very audience he has angered.”
It’s your opinion that Trump supporters in the medical field would let his son die over a difference in political opinion? That reflects poorly on you.
Kimmel didn’t beg for help. The initial surgery was performed within hours of the child’s birth. While the child will need more surgery as they age, Kimmel begged that, regardless of wealth, every child should have access to the same medical care as his son did.
Dr. Turley, as tempting as it is, those experienced all the way back to Internet Relay Chat (now called chat) within DARPA, understand DFTT (Don’t Feed The Trolls).
“Never argue with a moron, they’ll drag you down to their level, and beat you with experience.” — Usenet Cookie
If we really want to know where America is today, perhaps we should go back to history. If you substitute the “race” (it was really far more than race, even back then, it was simply categorize anyone – by race, by belief, or by the fact you simply wanted their business, assets, and lives). Substitute for “Trump” or “MAGA” or “Fascist” (or in reality “anyone I hate”) and identify the rhetoric and actions used by the NSDAP, Brownshirts, Leaders, with what we’re “hearing” today or seeing in the “No Kings” rallies and nationwide “protests”, the content of this article is alarmingly similar.
Kristallnacht – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristallnacht
Relevant quote from the above:
Many Berliners were, however, deeply ashamed of the pogrom, and some took great personal risks to offer help to their beleaguered neighbors. The son of a US consular official heard the janitor of his block cry: “They must have emptied the insane asylums and penitentiaries to find people who’d do things like that!”
I forgot to add that I get paid to post this crap because it pays for my meth
“I forgot to add that I get paid to post this crap because it pays for my meth”
Try carfentanil. Much more effective, and you might only need one dose…
Meanwhile, the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit agreed to lift the lower court’s order blocking the use of the Oregon National Guard.
After considering the record at this preliminary stage, we conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority under 10 U.S.C. § 12406(3), which authorizes the federalization of the National Guard when “the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.
The lack of support from PPB (Portland Police Bureau) has forced FPS (Federal Protective Service) to rely almost exclusively on ICE and SRT for assistance in preventing violent protesters from attacking officers and the facility in which they work.”
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.b3c1c6b0-b390-4c9d-b557-fc5d525fd150/gov.uscourts.ca9.b3c1c6b0-b390-4c9d-b557-fc5d525fd150.61.0.pdf
The tranny anonymous Democrat Marxist pedophile child sexual groomers almost always comment anonymously. (Gee, I wonder why?) I’ve decided to stop reading anonymous comments. That goes for any response to this comment. I think any reasonable person who reads this should do likewise.
20 million Latinos et al. illegally invade America, fraudulently claiming “asylum”—Latin land ain’t so grande after all.
The quislings tell them to come on in and vote (D) for DINERO.
The Latinos say “si,” senior.
The Mexicans cross the border to have an American baby.
Is that what the Constitution prescribed and intended?
What’s wrong with this picture?
The Latinos say, “nada,” senior.
There is a very serious point in your silly post. Illegals are subjects of foreign nations and cannot commit treason against usa while within its borders. Only citizens can commit treason. Let it sink in funnyman.
“We the People of the United States…secure the Blessings of Liberty TO OURSELVES and OUR POSTERITY….”
– The American Founders, 1789
____________________________________
Naturalization Acts of 1790, 1795, 1798, 1802
United States Congress, “An act to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,” March 26, 1790
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof….
Turley is an inconsistent idiot.
He should return whatever awards he has ever been given.
^ Paid DNC troll. Ignore. ^
Have your read Farenehit 451?
Yes.
Professor Turley is among the foremost legal scholars of our era, renowned for his unwavering commitment to the Constitution and impartiality. His expertise in legal commentary is unparalleled, and he consistently keeps his personal politics separate from his analysis. I wish I had the privilege of studying under him as a law professor.
Appeal to authority is fallaciousness. This blog is full of it.
This is not an appeal to authority. It’s an explanation that Professor Turley is an authority. See the difference? It responds to a comment saying Turley is not an authority.
Also, an appeal to authority is valid in general. It is only a fallacy if the authority is illegitimate. Like soda commercials featuring a famous athlete. The athlete may be an authority in his or her sport, but not on sodas.
But it is totally valid to appeal to authority, if the authority is legitimate. For example:
Q: What continent is Syria part of?
A: Asia
Q: How do you know?
A: Syria is in the Middle East, which the National Geographic Society classifies part of Asia.
“Turley is an inconsistent idiot. He should return whatever awards he has ever been given.”
Gaslighting
Gaslighting is the intended psychological manipulation by a low-IQ perpetrator of those they hope to victimize through intentionally misleading that person or persons. This involves the perpetrator lying, denying events, and other methods used with the intent to have their victims doubt their perceptions of reality, memories, and feel overly emotional or irrational. Within personal relationships, it is a form of psychological abuse and torture. The main five methods of gaslighting that may be used alone or in conjunction with others are: lying, blame shifting, countering, trivializing and withholding.
+100
Speaking of children’s books, here is one I just stumbled across, an older “veggie tales” sort of book, full of helpful advice for young people, and with color illustrations! In English, too! I predict that this book will be reprinted for modern audiences, in Blue States and soon! Florida and Texas will surely ban it, and other Red States. But in the meantime, From the river to the sea. . .
https://www.nhvweb.net/vhs/socialstudies/mrkirbyhistory/files/2013/09/Der-Giftpilz.pdf
Here is another really cool kid’s book! I am sooo glad that nobody ever banned these books! I am sooo glad that the right to free speech prevailed, because, reasons! U+1FAEO
https://collections.ctdigitalarchive.org/node/46748
Testing 🙄 instead of U+1FAEO
There is yet more evidence, as if intelligent people needed any, that Democrats have lost the American people. To put it in perspective, as of October 19, Jimmy Kimmel Live was ranked # 320 right above Pokemon at #321.
Top Shows Online October 19, 2025
Ranked by Television Stats online engagement score.
1 The Diplomat poster
[….]
319 ER
320 Jimmy Kimmel Live!
321 Pokémon
televisionstats.com/s/jimmy-kimmel-live
Not even Pokémon can save Democrats.
Democrats Are Losing the Culture War
Oct 13, 2025
Extensive polling, the surprising diversity of Trump’s 2024 coalition, and the share of minority voters who voted for Biden in 2020 but didn’t go to the polls last November all indicate there are millions of working Americans who think Democrats don’t share their priorities. Though some research suggests “wokeness” is a minor issue for swing voters today, the official stances taken to represent it—among them, elite support for mass migration, trans activism for kids, and inculcating schools and businesses with “anti-racist” and “decolonial” practices—clearly damaged the Democratic brand. When voters say Democrats are out of touch, the elevation of identity politics and relatively niche beliefs over populist economics is an obvious factor.
https://www.liberalpatriot.com/p/democrats-are-losing-the-culture
One might be tempted to wish the DNC requiescat in pace, but like Zombies, they refuse to give up the ghost. Perhaps playing a video loop of Father Knows Best will do the trick.
Dear Prof Turley,
First of all, the people ‘spreading mis/disinformation about the assassination of Charlie Kirk’ is not so much Jimmy Kimmel. That was not a 30.06 high velocity round that killed Charlie, and the charges against Tyler Robinson has more holes than a block of Swiss cheese at a rifle range. .. I look forward to Robinson’s preliminary hearing, assuming he gets one.
So, lets all calm down, take a deep breath and hold your taters. Presently, we don’t know who, or more importantly why, Charlie Kirk was assassinated.
Also, Shakespeare had nothing against Kings per se’.. . Kings got shat done.
*Jimmy Kimmel is like a poor man’s Jon Stewart. ..
Jon Stewart has jumped the shark. He is stark, raving mad.
“That was not a 30.06 high velocity round that killed Charlie, and the charges against Tyler Robinson has more holes than a block of Swiss cheese at a rifle range. .. I look forward to Robinson’s preliminary hearing, assuming he gets one.”
dgsnowden: sharing a crack pipe with Hunter Biden or ever increasing day drinking? What is it?
That fantasy world you described right there is either the result of one or both of those two options or, if possibly worse, a serious neurological pathology.
I knew you would say that.
There are high profile attorneys at law falling over themselves clamoring to defend this kid pro bono .. . how do you like them apples?
*reasonable, rational and authoritative argument is what’s tripping you up.
Tyler’s become a cult hero.
He’s going to be a-cult martyr in a few years.
Kimmel is more like nazi’s than he thinks. He doesn’t see the irony in his not funny show.
Reading requires work, consistency, attention to details, laser like focus, and being open to alternative ideas and possibilities. Reading leads to better odds of being successful in the future. The Left burn books because they lack all of the aforementioned. Their preferred behavior is violence since they get to be themselves: joyless, hopeless, failures at life
“Reading Is Fundamental (RIF) connects children with the joy of reading to spark imaginations and possibilities, putting kids on a path of reading proficiency. Because every child deserves the chance to succeed.”
https://www.rif.org/
Hmm.
“In conjunction with the International Year of the Child, First Lady Rosalynn Carter and daughter Amy host the first RIF National Reading Is Fun Day at the White House. Special guests included Carol Burnett, John Chancellor, Arthur Ashe, Maurice Sendak, and numerous students. ”
“In April, First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton presents the awards honoring the 1997 RIF National Poster Contest Winner and the National RIF Reader. ”
“In celebration of Hispanic Heritage Month, RIF partners with LeapFrog to launch new bilingual resources on RIF’s website and to provide over $100,000 worth of LeapPads and Spanish/English books to children across the country. ”
“LeVar Burton, a longtime literacy champion and RIF supporter, generously gifts Skybrary, an award-winning digital library of almost 1,000 eBooks and hundreds of real-world video field trips to RIF, enhancing RIF’s program offerings to now include print and digital books. Skybrary is available free to Title I classrooms. ”
“RIF launches our Race, Equity, and Inclusion Initiative, championing racial justice and equity through the power of literacy, focusing our commitment to support under-resourced communities of color, amplify diverse authors and illustrators, and launch an online destination of resources and best practices for educators and families. Macy’s is a founding partner in this critical work. ”
“RIF receives new federal support: 3 grants through the Congressionally directed spending process to bring books to students across three states as well as support through the AmeriCorps VISTA program to further expand RIF’s Race, Equity, and Inclusion initiative in 5 cities across the U.S. ”
Select specific Liberal actions in relation to RIF, from https://www.rif.org/about-us/our-history
Bravo Joy!
Jimmy Kimmel could make tarring and feathering offensive miscreants and riding them out of town on a rail fun again…
Kimmel did a bit on a talk show. Lovers-of-freedom meanwhile are banning books they’ve never read because they get to decide for everyone else what can be read, because liberty.
Of course “symbols are for the symbol-minded”, so it makes sense that Magats have to whine about this.
No one is banning books. We just do not think pornography in elementary school libraries is appropriate for children. Any sane, normal responsible adult would think the same thing.
You can go out and buy those books if you want. No one is stopping you.
That is not good enough for a sexual groomer of children. They want more. The fact that “Everyone” is a groomer is given away by his failure to give any specific example of what he was talking about, let alone a link. They know that if they specify what they mean, they will be revealed as the demonic pedophiles that they are.
Telling people about human behavior is not pornography. Any sane person would want children to learn this in school rather than getting half stories and full lies. I also am unsure a 10 year old is going out to buy many books at the few remaining bookstores, stores that are few and far between.
Even more, that instead of buy-once for a school library, those who hate those books want more copies of the books to be sold.
https://pen.org/banned-books-list-2025/
A Clockwork Orange, by Anthony Burgess
Breathless, by Jennifer Niven
Sold, by Patricia McCormick
Last Night at the Telegraph Club, by Malinda Lo
A Court of Mist and Fury, by Sarah J. Maas
Crank, by Ellen Hopkins
Forever…, by Judy Blume
The Perks of Being a Wallflower, by Stephen Chbosky
Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West, by Gregory Maguire
All Boys Aren’t Blue, by George M. Johnson
A Court of Thorns and Roses, by Sarah J. Maas
Damsel, by Elana K. Arnold
The DUFF: Designated Ugly Fat Friend, by Kody Keplinger
Nineteen Minutes, by Jodi Picoult
Storm and Fury, by Jennifer L. Armentrout
The Bluest Eye, by Toni Morrison
A Clash of Kings, by George R.R. Martin
A Court of Frost and Starlight, by Sarah J. Maas
A Court of Wings and Ruin, by Sarah J. Maas
Empire of Storms, by Sarah J. Maas
The Handmaid’s Tale, by Margaret Atwood
The Haters, by Jesse Andrews
The Hate U Give, by Angie Thomas
Identical, by Ellen Hopkins
Kingdom of Ash, by Sarah J. Maas
The Kite Runner, by Khaled Hosseini
Living Dead Girl, by Elizabeth Scott
Looking for Alaska, by John Green
Lucky, by Alice Sebold
Man o’War, by Cory McCarthy
Milk and Honey, by Rupi Kaur
Out of Darkness, by Ashley Hope Pérez
Perfect, by Ellen Hopkins
Red Hood, by Elana K. Arnold
A Stolen Life, by Jaycee Dugard
Thirteen Reasons Why, by Jay Asher
This Is Kind of an Epic Love Story, by Kacen Callender
Tilt, by Ellen Hopkins
Tower of Dawn, by Sarah J. Maas
Tricks, by Ellen Hopkins
Water for Elephants, by Sara Gruen
What Girls Are Made Of by Elana K. Arnold
I wonder how people grow up thinking that merely reading something can completely subvert who they are in just a moment. Gay people have existed ever since there were first people on the Earth, long before books or writing.
For some reason there is a really vicious minority who enjoys the idea of gay people hating themselves and want them to be alone for their entire lives or, and this is more puzzling, get married to ones they cannot stand and have children. That the gay people they hate and fear so much, that those are the ones they want to raise children. What a strange hate to have.
“Telling people about human behavior is not pornography.”
Telling grade school children that you’re instructing them on human behavior by showing them porn like “Gender Queer” that depicts equally young children giving each other blow jobs, pictures of dildoes shoved up other children’s asses is 100% groomer behavior using absolutely inappropriate pedophile pornography.
If you want to give the special educational material that gets you off to young children – give it to your own children. Not to the children of other parents without first getting their permission.
And why are you terrified of attempting to get those other parents’ permission first before distributing that child porn?
I noticed that nowhere did you attempt to justify the pedophile child sexual groomer’s assertion that any of these books were “banned by lovers of freedom.”
This is what you groomers do: deflect, deny, distract, gaslight, change the subject, and sealion. Get lost, groomer.
Let’s do some word substitution to get rid of the euphemisms, “people” and “human behavior”, and see how your statement holds up!
First, what you said – “Telling people about human behavior is not pornography. Any sane person would want children to learn this in school, rather than getting half stories and full lies. ”
Now, lets dump the euphemisms and cut to the chase!
Telling [kids] about [sodomy] is not pornography. Any sane person would want children to learn this in school, rather than getting half stories and full lies.
Telling [kids] about [fellatio] is not pornography. Any sane person would want children to learn this in school, rather than getting half stories and full lies.
Telling [kids] about [fisting] is not pornography. Any sane person would want children to learn this in school, rather than getting half stories and full lies.
Telling [kids] about [facials] is not pornography. Any sane person would want children to learn this in school, rather than getting half stories and full lies.
Telling [kids] about [69’ing] is not pornography. Any sane person would want children to learn this in school, rather than getting half stories and full lies.
Telling [kids] about [BDSM] is not pornography. Any sane person would want children to learn this in school, rather than getting half stories and full lies.
You know, there just seems to be something wrong about the non-euphemistic statements. I wonder what it could be???
If they are looking for books on those subjects they already know those acts exist. Is Sodomy alluded to in the Bible? I think it is, based on the name of the town.
Pornography is typically focused on providing sexual gratification. Which paragraphs do you think do so? Include the title, the edition, and the page number.
Recall how fun it was when a fake review went up about J.D. Vance having carnal knowledge of a sofa and no one on the right caught that it wasn’t in Vance’s book? It turns out that most right wing book ban fans have never read what they complain about. Being most of them are young adult fiction they don’t appeal to me, but those with library science degrees will have looked at them carefully before putting them on school book shelves. The librarians also honor requests that certain children are too tender to be allowed to read about human behavior and are limited to coloring books of flowers until they graduate high school.
“but those with library science degrees will have looked at them carefully before putting them on school book shelves. ”
Only in your fevered dreams! Just like, “any child wishing to obtain puberty blockers or hormone shots must go through rigid safeguards!”
🙄
Name one book that’s been banned. ONE. Now if you mean taking gay propaganda out of young children’s libraries you are either a groomer, a pedophile or a Democrat.
Actually there’s a surprising number of banned books One is Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and Tom Sawyer.
After persusing the internet, it’s seems both the left and right want to ban different books based on their own biases and beliefs.
We are in alarming “book burning times.”
“2022
After parent complaints about the use of racist epithets in To Kill a Mockingbird; Adventures of Huckleberry Finn; The Cay; Of Mice and Men; and Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry, the Burbank (CA) Unified School District superintendent removed these titles from required classroom reading lists. Following a review committee’s recommendation, the superintendent also banned the use of the N-word in all school classes. The titles are available for individual reading and teachers can use then with small groups after the teacher has undergone training on facilitating conversations on racism, implicit bias, and racial identity. The district will also review reading lists every eight years.
In response to concerns raised by students and parents, Of Mice and Men, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, and To Kill a Mockingbird were temporarily removed from the mandatory reading list of the William S. Hart Union High School District in Santa Clarita (CA). While the books remain in school libraries, teachers can no longer use them as part of their curricula. The district is accepting input students, teachers, and parents as they set criteria for what should be on mandatory reading lists. No timeline has been provided for when the criteria will be revealed or utilized.”
https://www.marshall.edu/library/bannedbooks/the-adventures-of-huckleberry-finn/
So, not a ban. Just removed from required reading until an educational foundation was in place to build an understanding of its place in modern society.
From the same page:
“Since its publication in 1884, the book has caused controversy starting in 1885 when it was banned in Concord (MA) as “trash and suitable only for the slums.””
Great books survive adversity.
Gaslighting Democrat Marxist Useless Idiots will regularly claim that a school district removing a book from school libraries forced parents to buy those books from an illicit back alley book dealer who sold those prohibited books to parents as his sideline gig to his main business of selling heroin to different types of addicts.
It was a crime for a book store to sell a person – especially a child under age 19 – that book.
Those books weren’t illegal to buy at local book stores, to purchase online from Amazon, etc – just banned by a few school boards. In California, no less.
When Democrat Marxist Useless Idiots don’t attempt to cosplay they don’t understand what book banning means, this explains why they should never be elected to be in government.
“Actually there’s a surprising number of banned books One is Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and Tom Sawyer.”
Actually, I have yet to see a desperately gaslighting Democrat Tranny Useful Idiot who can produce a list of books that a state or the federal government has designated is prohibited to either sell or to buy.
You would have to be a gaslighting Democrat Tranny Useful Idiot to claim you were prohibited from purchasing the Huckleberry Finn or Tom Sawyer books from Amazon or other book sellers.
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
https://www.amazon.com/Adventures-Huckleberry-Finn-Penguin-Classics/dp/0142437174
The Adventures Of Tom Sawyer: The Original 1876 Edition With Complete 162 Illustrations (A Classic Novel Of Mark Twain)
https://www.amazon.com/Adventures-Tom-Sawyer-Original-Illustrations/dp/B09484PM14/ref=asc_df_B09484PM14?tag=bngsmtphsnus-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=80882941400136&hvnetw=s&hvqmt=e&hvbmt=be&hvdev=c&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=111674&hvtargid=pla-4584482468636302&psc=1
Gaslighting
Gaslighting is the intended psychological manipulation by a low-IQ perpetrator of those they hope to victimize through intentionally misleading that person or persons. This involves the perpetrator lying, denying events, and other methods used with the intent to have their victims doubt their perceptions of reality, memories, and feel overly emotional or irrational. Within personal relationships, it is a form of psychological abuse and torture. The main five methods of gaslighting that may be used alone or in conjunction with others are: lying, blame shifting, countering, trivializing and withholding.
The bans are at school libraries. Your rhetoric here is a standard disingenuous response to the bans.
Rabble:
And yet, your overarching argument is still broken. Book Bans implies/means that the book is unable to be legally recieved anywhere, yet, even if a school library doesn’t allow it, the parents can still hike their little ones down to the local library and rent it, buy it from bookstores, or download it onto their iPads.
“you are either a groomer, a pedophile or a Democrat.”
But Hullbobby; like Mark Twain, you repeat yourself.
“you are either a groomer, a pedophile or a Democrat.”
Are those really multiple categories?
Donald Trump gets 2 out of 3. He was a Democrat, but found Republicans would be more accepting of those behaviors.
“Lovers-of-freedom meanwhile are banning books they’ve never read because they get to decide for everyone else what can be read, because liberty.”
Where do I find the list of “banned books” that Everyone can’t buy from Amazon, his preferred back alley magazine store, etc? If we’re banning books, there must be a list of those it is illegal to sell or buy! Or maybe you don’t understand what the words “book banning” means?
Why is it that Biden’s Tranny Furries are demanding that grade school libraries for children who still believe in Santa Clause must have their donated copies of Hustler magazine with their legs-spread crotch shots pictorials from the front copy to the back. Oh… and a little of that dildo-up-the-ringpiece exciting pictures for variety!
Everyone, tell us why the “Magats” should agree with you and your demand to be allowed to provide those kiddies with the kinds of reading material you want them to have? Some parents both Republican and Democrat are going to say that is Groomer Pedophile behavior.
The anonymous child sexual groomers’ attempts have crashed and burned today, failing in spectacular fashion. USA! USA! USA!