The criminal trial of Wesley Snipes and two other men will focus on a little known movement based on Section 861 of the Internal Revenue Code. This group argues that citizens are only required to pay taxed on earnings made outside but not inside the country. Snipes could be looking at real jail time for his involvement with the group even after he signed a affidavit of incompetence in 2000 that he does not understand his basic tax obligations. Continue reading “Wesley Snipes Trial to Highlight 861 Scam — Considered a Cult-like Movement By Tax Experts”
Category: Lawyering
Archbishop Earl Paulk’s problems just got a lot more serious. As reported earlier, he has been under criminal investigation in Georgia and now an arrest warrant has been issued for the 80-year-old leader of the Holy Spirit at Chapel Hill Harvester Church after a long investigation by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation. He is accused of felony perjury related to a civil lawsuit alleging that he coerced a church employee to have an affair with him. Continue reading “Arrest Warrant Issued for Archbishop Earl Paulk”
Nothing becomes politics quite like death. With a presidential election approaching and three important cases before the Supreme Court, the country is once again grappling with the death penalty. Politicians and citizens alike are debating how — and whether — we should kill those who kill others.
It is a debate with particular importance to Ralph Baze and Thomas Clyde Bowling Jr., death-row inmates who are challenging the constitutionality of lethal injection as a method of execution in Kentucky. The court is set to issue its first ruling in more than 100 years on the method of executions. Continue reading “From The Brazen Bull to Lethal Injection: The Punishment Fits the Times”
Ezra Levant is hardly a popular choice for many who defend free speech. He is considered by many as something of a right wingnut in Canada who publishes the controversial Western Standard. However, he has released a disturbing video of a hearing in which he was called to account for his publication of the Danish Mohammed cartoon that led to the violence around the world. The hearing before the Alberta Human Rights and Citizenship Commission should not sit well with civil libertarians who resist government controls or coercion of free speech. Watching these videos raises serious questions about the scope of these laws and whether they are intruding on protected areas of speech. Continue reading “Hate Speech or State Coercion?: Video of Ezra Levant Hearing Raises Serious Questions over Hate Speech Investigations in Canada”
Despite its strong secular traditions, Israel remains a nation with many laws and customs enforced to protect Jewish religious practices. Public buses have long been a danger zone for women who are targeted by ultra-orthodox Jews for wearing trousers or mixing with men. Women have been physically assaulted and are forced to sit in the back of the bus in religious areas. Now, the Israeli Supreme Court is faced with a filing by women who have refused to move to the back of the bus like Rosa Parks. Continue reading “Rosa Parks Part II: Israeli Women Fight Against Attacks and Segregation on Public Buses”
In a fascinating case in Arkansas, the state Supreme Court has ruled that a child conceived through in vitro fertilization is not his father’s heir if the embryo was implanted after his death. Amy Finley’s problem is that the state law predates in vitro procedures and thus the court found no intention of the legislature to extend inheritance to such births. The case raises the question of not just the meaning of conception but the status of posthumous children. Continue reading “Embryo No Heir: Court Rules Post-Death Implantation of Embryo Qualifies for Inheritance”
“Judge Alex” may get good review on his TV faux court show, but he faced decidedly poor review before real justices on the Supreme Court. Alex Ferrer’s contract dispute with an artists’ manager, Arnold Preston, made it to the Supreme Court this week and most justices appeared to reject the TV judge’s claims in the contract dispute. Continue reading “Faux TV Judge Goes to Real Court: Justices Express “Skepticism” Over Claims of “Judge Alex” in Supreme Court”
In a surprising move, the Bush Administration has supported D.C. in the upcoming review of its gun control laws just as gun rights advocates thought they had finally achieved an upper hand on the long-unresolved constitutional question. Continue reading “Bush Administration Backs D.C. Gun Controls Before Supreme Court”
In the world of jail house law, Scott Anthony Gomez Jr. is a stand out. Convicted of weapons charges, Gomez escapted once from the Pueblo County Jail in Colorado, only to be caught again. In his his attempt, he fell from an 85 foot height, seriously injuring himself. He argues in his federal filing that, if the jail was better secured, he would not have attempt such an act. Continue reading “Inmate Sues Jail for Injuries from Escape Attempt — Alleges Negligent Security”
In a very difficult and interesting first amendment case, a family court in Providence has ordered a blogger to stop writing about her own case on custodyscam.blogspot.com. Rev. Anne Grant — who heads the Parenting Project based at the Mathewson Street United Methodist Church in Providence — is challenging Family Court Judge John A. Mutter’s before the state supreme court on first speech grounds. Continue reading “Court Orders Blogger to Stop Writing About A Pending Case and Children”
With little attention in the media, the Justice Department has filed papers in federal court arguing that the CIA did not have an obligation to preserve the infamous torture tapes and therefore was lawfully entitled to destroy them. The filing patently demonstrates the conflict of interest in Attorney General Michael Mukasey insisting that the Justice Department investigate the possible criminal conduct in the matter. Now, the Justice Department is not only investigating itself, but it is investigating a crime that it has rejected as baseless in court filings. The ACLU case has also shown that other officials were aware of the tapes, including the CIA Inspector General’s Office — which means that the agency “watchdogs” knew of a torture program – a clear criminal enterprise – and did nothing. Continue reading “Justice Department Argues in Court that CIA Did Not Have to Preserve Torture Tapes While It Continues to “Independently Investigate” That Very Crime”
With states and citizens objecting, the Congress and the Bush Administration have moved ahead to require a national identification card — abandoning decades of opposition to such a system on civil liberties grounds. I testified against this proposal when it was first made in the immediate aftermath of the 9-11 attacks. What is truly remarkable is that the REAL ID has become little more than an excuse to do something that the Bush Administration has been trying to do for years: create interlocking databases on citizens. Continue reading “Your Papers Please: The United States Adopts a National ID Card And Abandons Priniciples”
In November 2001, I testified against the national identification card proposal when it was first made in Congress. Below is the oral testimony from that hearing before the House Government Reform Committee, Financial Management and Intergovernmental Relations Subcommittee on Nov. 16, 2001: Continue reading “National Identification Card Testimony”
Warren Zier could have used from blind justice this month when he appeared before Milwaukee Circuit Judge William Sosnay wearing an ascot. Putting aside the question of the stylistic choices of an ascot for a court appearance, Sosnay saw the item as a violation of court rules. However, prosecutor Zier could have a case — and a line of harrumphing ascot-wearing prigs in protest behind him. Continue reading “My Cousin Vinny Moment: Judge Stops Proceedings Over Prosecutor’s Neckwear”
Torts lawyer Richard “Dickie” Scruggs has long been famous or infamous depending on your view of his windfall, one billion fee award in the tobacco settlement. Now, the brother-in-law of Trent Lott will face a criminal trial on bribery and related charges with his son. To make matters worse, his legal team just withdrew from his defense. Continue reading “Famous Torts Lawyer Dickie Scruggs Indicted With Son for Bribery: Defense Counsel Withdraw From Case”