Category: Politics

Ninth Circuit Briefing Completed Today For Ruling On Trump Appeal

200px-US-CourtOfAppeals-9thCircuit-Seal.svgdepartment-of-justice-logo1 The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will have a completed record for its review of the lower court’s stay of the Trump immigration executive order this afternoon. While much has been made of the court declined to issue an immediate stay of the lower court under the earlier emergency motion, the decision was very predictable. The Court instead ordered for an expedited response from the states of Washington and Minnesota. That argument is complete today. What remains is a relatively rare procedural process in seeking to review a temporary restraining order (TRO) before the issuance of a written opinion, let alone a permanent injunction.

Continue reading “Ninth Circuit Briefing Completed Today For Ruling On Trump Appeal”

The Superbowl Ad You Will Not Be Seeing Today [Updated]

screen-shot-2017-02-05-at-11-02-32-am84 Lumber is a building materials supply company that is the latest to trigger a Superbowl advertisement  controversy over an ad.  We have previously discussed how groups like PETA often seems to engineer conflicts (and rejections) to get more attention than would have been generated by a commercial itself.  Whatever the motivation, 84 Lumber has garnered massive attention after its commercial “The Journey Begins” was rejected by Fox as too political and divisive.  With some 47 percent of the public supporting the Trump executive order, it is a risky move that the attention could create as much anger as support among potential customers.  Regrettably, I will be on a flight to Guam (which takes off at the time of the kickoff).  I will try to get the game on the flight but I enjoy having a Superbowl party with the kids. We enjoy the commercials often as much as the game.  The company said that it was censored but allowed to run an altered commercial.  Maggie Hardy Magerko, 84 Lumber’s president and owner, is quoted as saying “I still can’t even understand why it was censored. In fact, I’m flabbergasted by that in today’s day and age. It’s not pornographic, it’s not immoral, it’s not racist.”

Continue reading “The Superbowl Ad You Will Not Be Seeing Today [Updated]”

Ninth Circuit Rejects Motion For Immediate Reinstatement Of Executive Order But Schedules Expedited Argument For Monday

200px-US-CourtOfAppeals-9thCircuit-Seal.svgdepartment-of-justice-logo1 The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has declined a demand for an immediate reinstatement of the Executive Order on immigration but has scheduled expedited arguments and filings in the case for Monday.  The decision is not surprising in such a case.  Courts need to hear from the other side in the dispute, particularly when the Washington Attorney General prevailed in the trial court.  Moreover, a temporary restraining order is very difficult to reverse on an interlocutory appeal.  Normally, appellate courts will wait for a final decision and opinion from the lower court before agreeing to review the controversy.  Of course, nothing is “normal” about this controversy in terms of procedure or policy.  With a major executive order stayed, the Ninth Circuit is clearly moving with dispatch but deliberation.  The Justice Department team was not helped by President Trump’s tweets casting aspersations on Judge James Robart of Federal District Court in Seattle as a “so called judge.”   Such comments undermine the credibility of the claims. It is less compelling to demand respect for the executive branch if you are viewed as denigrating the judicial branch.  While there is ample reason to question the ruling of Judge Robart, but he is a respected judge who made a good-faith decision on a tough legal question.   He is not a “so-called judge” but a real judge and has the Senate confirmation to prove it.  Having said that, media playing up the “rejection” by the Ninth Circuit are not being entirely accurate.  The Ninth Circuit wants more argument and has not reached the merits.  There is still question whether it will reach the merits on a TRO appeal.  I still believe that President Trump has the advantage legally and we could see this order stayed.  The question is when and how since this remains a temporary restraining order without a written opinion from Judge Robart.

Continue reading “Ninth Circuit Rejects Motion For Immediate Reinstatement Of Executive Order But Schedules Expedited Argument For Monday”

Cleric: Killing Kurds Who Convert To Zoroastrianism Is “Legitimate”

By Darren Smith, Weekend Contributor

In another example of attempts to legitimize murder for apostasy, an Islamist Cleric of the Kurdistan Islamic Group (KIG) declared in an interview with the BBC that Kurds who leave Islam to convert to Zoroastrianism are to be murdered; or in his words “Killed and Executed.”

The cleric extended his hand of mercy by allowing those converts three days to regret their decision but thereafter are to be executed.

In an almost brutal irony, Mulla Hassib from Sulaimani said that Islamic religious tenets permit such executions, but ISIS’ practice of killing apostates is partially correct but he criticizes the terrorist organization for spreading the religion by means of “violence”.

Continue reading “Cleric: Killing Kurds Who Convert To Zoroastrianism Is “Legitimate””

HOW TO [REALLY] CHANGE THE SUPREME COURT: THREE REFORMS THAT COULD MAKE FOR A BIGGER AND BETTER COURT

Supreme Court

I recently published a column in the Los Angeles Times on reforming the Supreme Court with three fundamental changes that could be accomplished without a constitutional amendment.  Below is a longer version of that column on the three reforms and their implications.

Continue reading “HOW TO [REALLY] CHANGE THE SUPREME COURT: THREE REFORMS THAT COULD MAKE FOR A BIGGER AND BETTER COURT”

GAME CHANGER: THE GORSUCH NOMINATION GOES TO CAPITOL HILL

ap17024739756097donald_trump_president-elect_portrait_croppedBelow is my column in The Hill newspaper on the nomination of Tenth Circuit Neil Gorsuch.  If President Trump sought to change the subject from immigration, I doubt this will do it. However, as I discuss in the column, if he sought to quiet restless Republicans over a truly dreadful performance of the Administration in the first week, the nomination should do so. He is a jurist with impeccable credentials and will be very impressive in the upcoming hearings.  He is, to put it simply, a game changer.

Continue reading “GAME CHANGER: THE GORSUCH NOMINATION GOES TO CAPITOL HILL”

If Trump Seeks A Legacy On the Court, He Should Change The Court Itself . . . Not Its Membership

Supreme CourtThe Los Angeles Times has published my column on reforming the Supreme Court.  If President Trump truly wants to leave a legacy on the Court, he should focus not on changing the membership but changing the institutional itself. Continue reading “If Trump Seeks A Legacy On the Court, He Should Change The Court Itself . . . Not Its Membership”

TRUMP NOMINATES NEIL GORSUCH FOR THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

ap17024739756097President Donald Trump has made his choice for the Supreme Court and it is Tenth Circuit Judge Neil Gorsuch, 49.  With the selection, President Trump would be submitting a jurist with unassailable credentials and proven intellect.  He is also someone with a proven conservative record, though there are a few blind spots for those who want a nominee vaccinated against what conservatives view as the David Souter virus — a creeping condition where a conservative gravitates to the left of the Court with time.  Last night, The Hill newspaper ran my column on Gorsuch and his unquestioned qualifications.

Continue reading “TRUMP NOMINATES NEIL GORSUCH FOR THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT”

Trump Fires Acting Attorney General Over Refusal To Defend Executive Order

sally_q-_yatesdonald_trump_president-elect_portrait_croppedPresident Donald Trump fired acting Attorney General Sally Yates Monday night for “refusing to enforce a legal order designed to protect the citizens of the United States.”  As I stated on “Morning Joe” this morning, Trump clearly has the right to fire Yates.  Indeed, Yates’ action (and rationale) contradicts long-standing Justice Department policies on such issues.  Despite my personal opposition to this executive order, I believe that Yates was mistaken to take this action and that it does not serve the interests of justice to obstruct efforts to have this matter fully litigated before a court for independent review.

Continue reading “Trump Fires Acting Attorney General Over Refusal To Defend Executive Order”

Is The Trump Executive Order on Refugees Unlawful?

donald_trump_president-elect_portrait_croppedI previously discussed how President Donald Trump has the advantage in a constitutional challenge of this executive order suspending entry for refugees and imposing special limitations on seven stated countries.  As I have noted, this does not mean that there are not legitimate questions raised, particularly over the express preference to be given “religious minorities” under the order. However, the case laws heavily supports a president’s plenary power over such border controls.  There remains however a question over whether the law could be constitutional under a president’s inherent authority but still unlawful under statutory authority.  Most of that argument centers on the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, which bars discrimination based on nationality or place of origin.  There are clearly compelling arguments on both sides of this question, but once again I believe that critics may be overstating the 1965 law as making the executive order facially invalid.  As I have repeatedly stated since this executive order was signed, I believe it was a terrible mistake, poorly executed, and inimical to our values as a nation.  However, legal analysis by a court should not be influenced by such personal viewpoints.  The question is solely whether the president is barred statutorily from taking this action.

Continue reading “Is The Trump Executive Order on Refugees Unlawful?”

James Carville Calls For Democrats To Work With David Brock

440px-james_carville_1

We recently discussed the continued evolution of David Brock who went from attacking Hillary Clinton, then professing allegiance to Clinton and attacking her opponents like Bernie Sanders, then professing allegiance to Sanders and promising to attack his opponents.

In the last election, Clinton was attacked for her association with Brock who was viewed as reaching a new level of sleazy and vicious work. You may recall Bernie Sanders denouncing Clinton for her continued alliance with Brock and use of his controversial PAC organizations. Sanders referred to Brock as simple “scum” but Clinton refused to denounce Brock or to discourage Democrats from working with or contributing to his PACs. As we discussed, it turns out that even Clinton aides were disgusted by Clinton’s refusal to cut off Brock or to denounce his work. In the latest batch of Wikileaks, Neera Tanden, the President of Center for American Progress, allegedly emailed John Podesta that “I hope Hillary truly understands now how batshit crazy David Brock is.” That does not appear to be a problem for various Democrats donors and speakers who attended a recent Brock retreat or James Carville who has called for Democrats to embrace Brock. Carville was previously paid by Brock who raised millions after his conversion to a Democratic attack dog.  Carville dismissed Democrats who object to Brock’s vicious conduct and said that those who want to fight Trump without resorting to people like Brock are wearing “ideological chastity belts.”

 

Continue reading “James Carville Calls For Democrats To Work With David Brock”

Is The Trump Executive Order On Refugees Constitutional?

donald_trump_president-elect_portrait_croppedLate Friday, President Donald Trump carried out one of his primary campaign promised this week with a suspension on the entry of all refugees to the United States and an order for “extreme vetting” as a condition for entry for some foreign citizens.  The order below specifically suspends entry of all refugees to the United States for 120 days, bars Syrian refugees indefinitely, and blocks entry into the United States for 90 days for citizens from seven countries: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.  The order had immediate impact on travelers who were denied entry to the United States and held at some airports like JFK.  Lawsuits have already been filed challenging the executive order but those challenges will face a considerable challenge in seeking an injunction by a federal court.

Continue reading “Is The Trump Executive Order On Refugees Constitutional?”

New Study Supports White House Claim On “Most Watched Inauguration”

inauguration_crowd_size_comparison_between_trump_2017_and_obama_2009After the inauguration, the White House was heavily criticized for President Trump’s repeated criticism of the media over how big of a crowd he attracted at his inauguration, particularly in comparison to the inaugurations of former President Obama.  As I stated at the time, I thought both Trump’s comments at the CIA and Sean Spicer’s first press conference were mistakes.  They lost the first 48 hour news cycle to a discuss about Trump’s perceived insecurities and factual assertions that were later challenged.  Newspapers have reported (with White House staff as sources) that Trump was alarmingly obsessed with the issue. It was a performance that even  stalwart supporters like Charles Krauthammer on Fox called “weird.”  Likewise, Fox News has described Spicer’s facts as “incorrect.” While it does appear that the crowd at the inauguration was smaller (which again I fail to see as a serious problem) and the figures released by Spicer on metro ridership were wrong, but the BBC is reporting  with other sources that Trump’s inauguration a study on live streaming sources that supports Spicer’s claim that the actual viewership was in fact the largest in history.

Continue reading “New Study Supports White House Claim On “Most Watched Inauguration””

Gallup: Obama Low In Popularity Among Modern Presidents [Updated]

220px-Richard_NixonPresident_Barack_ObamaThere was considerable coverage about the high popularity of President Barack Obama as he left office — often in comparison with the dropping polls of President Trump.  However, the White House pushed back on what it considered misleading poll stories.  Now Gallup may support the position of the White House — at least on the average of the Obama numbers.  Most polls show a surge of support at the end of Obama’s term.  Gallup shows Obama at relatively low polling numbers on average in comparison to past presidents.  This does not compare the polling at the time of his departure.  Indeed, even Nixon showed better polling numbers.  However, another poll this week shows Obama as just behind Reagan as the country’s greatest president.

Continue reading “Gallup: Obama Low In Popularity Among Modern Presidents [Updated]”

Teachers In Alabama and Texas Suspended After Anti-Obama and Anti-Trump Displays

1485463193558
It appears that teachers are having a difficult time keeping their political views out of classroom.  Recently, an Alabama teacher was put on suspension for projecting an image of Obama with “You’re fired” after the election.  Now, on the other side of the political spectrum, a  Texas high school art teacher has been placed on administrative leave after video surfaced showing her “shooting” the image of President Donald Trump in a classroom while screaming, “Die!”

Continue reading “Teachers In Alabama and Texas Suspended After Anti-Obama and Anti-Trump Displays”

Res ipsa loquitur – The thing itself speaks