Christmas Do and Don’ts: Giving Liver (Good); Opening Gift Early (Bad)

Lessons of the holiday abound. On the nice list is Chad McMaster who gave part of his liver to his grandmother, Patricia Middleton. On the naughty list, is Misty Johnson who , 34, was arrested and charged with aggravated assault and battery after stabbing her husband in the chest for reportedly opening his gift early.   Then there is a spate of Santa gropings and attacks –which would go into the naughty category. Continue reading “Christmas Do and Don’ts: Giving Liver (Good); Opening Gift Early (Bad)”

Engineering Deaf Babies for Deaf Couples: U.S. and Britain Debate the Selection of Deaf Embryos and Adopted Children

The Royal National Institute for Deaf and Hard of Hearing People has weighed in on the controversy over the selection of deaf children for adopting deaf couples. The Institute supports the practice. However, there remains a greater debate over the decision of American parents to engineer a deaf child through artificial selection. Continue reading “Engineering Deaf Babies for Deaf Couples: U.S. and Britain Debate the Selection of Deaf Embryos and Adopted Children”

Forget the Gideon: Inmate Demands Thor’s Hammer and Sword in First Amendment Challenge

While other inmates are fighting over the right to have small nativity scenes in their cells, Michael Polk in Utah is demanding more Nordic religious items: a hammer and sword. Prison officers are a bit reluctant since Polk is serving time for aggravated assault and robbery. He is also a practicing member of the Asatru religion, which worships the Nordic gods, such as Odin, Thor, Tyr, and Heimdal.  It turns out that he may have a limited case. Continue reading “Forget the Gideon: Inmate Demands Thor’s Hammer and Sword in First Amendment Challenge”

The Crucifixion of Santa: Free Speech or Public Nuisance?

Neighbors of Art Conrad are up in arms and demanding action after Conrad hoisted a crucified Santa over his house as a protest of the commercialization of Christmas. He also has a headless Santa singing carols on his front porch. The display in Washington state is likely protected speech despite the trauma to children and anger of neighbors. Continue reading “The Crucifixion of Santa: Free Speech or Public Nuisance?”

9-11 Commission Specifically Requested Evidence Destroyed by the CIA — Staff Reviewing Possible Crimes in Denial

While the Bush Administration works to prevent anyone from investigating its own possible misconduct in the CIA tape scandal, the 9-11 Commission has already concluded that the Administration lied to its investigators and destroyed evidence specifically demanded by the Commission. Continue reading “9-11 Commission Specifically Requested Evidence Destroyed by the CIA — Staff Reviewing Possible Crimes in Denial”

Pit Bulls Go to Supreme Court: Are Breed-Specific Laws Unconstitutional?

In the last two decades, many cities have passed breed specific bans or limitations on dog owners. Pit bulls are the most common cited breed and one owner is now taking his dogs and his case to the Supreme Court. Paul Tellings likes his pit bulls and has challenged a Toledo law as baseless and biased. While the odds are against a grant of cert in the case, it would allow review of a highly controversial trend across the country. Continue reading “Pit Bulls Go to Supreme Court: Are Breed-Specific Laws Unconstitutional?”

Chilling Tape of Texas Homeowner Killing Two Men in Texas Re-Ignites National Debate over the Castle Doctrine and Make My Day Laws

With the conviction of John White in New York for the killing of a teen on his lawn and the possible indictment of Joe Horn in Texas for killing two burglars on his lawn, the national debate over the so-called Castle Doctrine or Make My Day laws is intensifying. Continue reading “Chilling Tape of Texas Homeowner Killing Two Men in Texas Re-Ignites National Debate over the Castle Doctrine and Make My Day Laws”

Castle Breached: Homeowner Convicted of Killing Teen on Lawn in Racially Charged New York Case

John White, an African American homeowner, claimed that he was merely protecting his home and his son from a racial attack when he shot Daniel Cicciaro in the face. A jury disagreed and convicted White, 54, of second-degree manslaughter. It is a case often cited in relation to the Castle Doctrine, allowing homeowners to repel invaders with lethal force — one of two current cases (with the Horn case in Texas) of shootings on the lawns of homeowners. Continue reading “Castle Breached: Homeowner Convicted of Killing Teen on Lawn in Racially Charged New York Case”

CIGNA Facing Lawsuit After It Denies Coverage for Liver Transport and Teen Dies

In a lawsuit that seems like a scene out of Michael Moore’s SICKO recent film on the U.S. health system, CIGNA is facing a lawsuit after it denied coverage to Nataline Sarkisyan who needed a liver transplant. The California teenager, 17, died at the University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center despite the fact that a match was found weeks previously. CIGNA HealthCare decided that the procedure was “too experimental” to try — or least pay for. Now, there is a called for manslaughter charges against CIGNA — and a likely tort action. Continue reading “CIGNA Facing Lawsuit After It Denies Coverage for Liver Transport and Teen Dies”

Federal Court: Motor Cycle Bikers Not Allowed to Wear Colors While Tasting Garlic

The Top Hatters Motorcycle Club likes motor cycle and garlic, but the two do not always mix in the famous Gilroy Garlic festival. Police refused to allow the club members to wear their club colors at the festival and they sued. A district court and the Ninth Circuit ruled for the city and the bikers are now appealing for an en banc ruling. Continue reading “Federal Court: Motor Cycle Bikers Not Allowed to Wear Colors While Tasting Garlic”

Federal Court Rules that Nurses Cannot be Required to Have Flu Shots

In a ruling that will surprise many public health officials, the Ninth Circuit has upheld an arbitration decision that found that nurses at Virginia Mason hospital in Washington could not require that nurses receive flu shots as a condition for employment — a victory for the Washington State Nurses Association. It will likely be a concern for public health officials planning for pandemic and other risks, particularly given the court’s recognition of the strong public health reasons for the rule. Continue reading “Federal Court Rules that Nurses Cannot be Required to Have Flu Shots”

Surrogate Mother Loses Ohio Appeal for Triplets: Court Rules No Egg, No Claim

The Ohio Supreme Court has handed down an important ruling on the right (or lack thereof) of surrogate mothers. Danielle Bimber was accused of breaking her surrogacy contract with James Flynn and his partner Eileen Donich, when she decided to keep the triplets conceived with Flynn’s sperm and Donich’s implanted egg. Continue reading “Surrogate Mother Loses Ohio Appeal for Triplets: Court Rules No Egg, No Claim”

Federal Judge Appears to be Leaning Toward Bush Administration on Destroyed CIA Tapes

U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy appears inclined to back off, at least for now, from inquiring into the destruction of tapes of CIA interrogations despite his order to preserve such evidence. This is not, however, the last word for Kennedy or other judges lining up on the issue. Continue reading “Federal Judge Appears to be Leaning Toward Bush Administration on Destroyed CIA Tapes”

N.Y. Attorney Accused in Witness Killing — and Running a Brothel

Paul Bergrin, a defense lawyer and former prosecutor, has been accused of going a bit too far in fulfilling his duty of zealous advocacy for his client: police believed that Bergrin encouraged the 2004 killing of Deshawn McCray. He is also accused of running a brothel with representatives from the oldest profession. Continue reading “N.Y. Attorney Accused in Witness Killing — and Running a Brothel”