Talkin’ Turkey: Palin Gives Interview as Man Slaughters Turkeys Behind Her

defaultThis video should be a classic for years to come. Gov. Sarah Palin gave an interview this week after giving a turkey the annual reprieve — a photo op that all politicians crave. This is not exactly what they strive for. As she speaks to reporters, look over her shoulder. A man proceeds to slaughter less politically connected turkeys behind her.

Of course, Palin may be able to claim to have personally uncovered health code violations. Open-air slaughtering may be permitted in Alaska, but that place looks like an invitation for a surprise inspection.

I love how the turkey guy is watching eagerly as he stuffs a turkey head first in the machine. It is a powerful backdrop for Palin to recount her blessings of the year. I particularly like how Palin speaks of how brutal the campaign has been with the guy working over these birds in the background.

We can all look forward to Palin’s Annual Christmas Greetings from the fat rendering plant.

For the video, click here.

19 Responses to “Talkin’ Turkey: Palin Gives Interview as Man Slaughters Turkeys Behind Her”


  1. 1 Jill 1, November 21, 2008 at 1:54 pm

    I hope Red State Update makes a video about this. This is the best Thanksgiving ever!!!

  2. 2 Jill 1, November 21, 2008 at 2:40 pm

    This isn’t real is it? If it is, Sara’s chief of symbols is really off his game!

    If this is true and you enjoyed watching it, you have to give money to a turkey sanctuary, sort of like a moral carbon offset.

  3. 3 jonathanturley 1, November 21, 2008 at 4:06 pm

    It is indeed the real McCoy. Fox, CBS and others have picked it up. This will be the most famous turkey killer in history. If he does not end up on Good Morning America, there is something wrong with this country.

  4. 4 Bob, Esq. 1, November 21, 2008 at 4:28 pm

    Homer Simpson: “Mmmm… turkey.”

  5. 5 Jericho 1, November 21, 2008 at 7:29 pm

    Them turkeys have to get slaughtered somewhere, somehow?

    And if Palin gives an interview where I work, I know I won’t stop doing whatever I’ll be doing.

    Am I missing the issue?

  6. 6 Charity 1, November 21, 2008 at 8:25 pm

    I read the turkey guy’s expression as, “Really? You’re going to do an interview? Right there?…. Well, okay!”

  7. 7 Jill 1, November 21, 2008 at 8:56 pm

    Charity,

    That is a rather cynical interpretation. I suppose you think Joe the Plumber was trying to milk his 15 mins. of fame!

  8. 8 Former Federal LEO 1, November 21, 2008 at 10:09 pm

    I saw a triad of turkeys in the clip but only the worst of them was cacklin’…

  9. 9 mespo727272 1, November 22, 2008 at 10:39 am

    I have no expertise as a camera operator but what would possess the guy or gal to frame that shot so that our friendly poultry worker was the main subject of the shot while Palin was speaking? I like to think that he/she was a patriot exposing the loon on the left of the shot as the demagogue she truly has become.

  10. 10 Buddha Is Laughing 1, November 22, 2008 at 11:10 am

    mespo,

    I’ve shot a fair amount of stills (H.S. paper + amateur art photos) and I know a few video professionals. The framing says it all. Unless they had never operated a camera before, were high, were just plain dumb or suffer an almost Homer-like turkey compulsion (Bob? Are you shooting video on the side?) there is a possibility it was a purposeful shot based on the framing alone. While the video made me smile, the thought that it’s purposeful makes me laugh out loud. The best sabotage is so subtle it looks like accident or natural process.

  11. 11 Jill 1, November 22, 2008 at 11:26 am

    I think it was on purpose. The symbolism is just too striking. The guerilla videographer!

  12. 12 Mike Spindell 1, November 22, 2008 at 2:25 pm

    Let me make this clear: I loathe Sara Palin, cannot stand to hear her speak and truly believe that she is an ignorant bimbo. That caveat expressed, I do believe that the MSM is consciously trying to destroy her and I decry it. This is not for her sake because she is a figure that truly deserves political destruction.

    However, our MSM and its’ pundits view political destruction and ridicule as a game. They derive a sadistic satisfaction from it as long as their targets don’t frighten them. After all it wasn’t until Bush and Cheney’s popularity ratings plummeted that these media Brahmans began to ridicule them. Prior to that they blandly accepted and defended a murderous, illegal war and destruction of our constitutional protections, because like bully’s everywhere they were too cowardly to take on power. It was much easier to ridicule Kerry as being too French, Hillary as a bitch, Biden as a plagiarizer, etc. ad infinitum.

    Palin was initially lionized as a “game changer” although polls within a week began to show that the public in general didn’t care for her. The lionization continued way past the point when the rest of us realized she was McCain’s mistake. Finally, when the punditry and MSM were confronted by her inability to perform creditably in Gibson and Couric’s rather softball interviews, these dim bulbs (thought to be perceptive)followed the public and turned on her. At this point they need for her to be destroyed so they can forget their own misperceptions and lack of insight. Just as they only lately have turned on Bush.

    My problem with all this is that the MSM and assorted pundits are in the main smugly insular know nothings who exert some influence on an unsuspecting public, who have been conned into believing they are savvy via a tautological exercise of self congratulation by the MSM tools. While Palin deserves this ridicule, I’ve seen this process played out with too many worthy people, to take satisfaction in her destruction.

  13. 13 Buddha Is Laughing 1, November 23, 2008 at 10:06 pm

    Mike,

    The MSM reminds me of The Gov’s henchmen in “Blazing Saddles”.

    All is well and good until someone (in this case, Mel Brooks) says, “I didn’t get a harumph outta that guy!”

    You raise some valid points there, including the one about Palin deserving destruction and political neutralization. But I have to agree the media is acting badly on the whole. I point to Chris Matthews, the former Cheney butt kisser deluxe who now gets a thrill up his leg over Obama. Could this guy be any more of a suck up? I think not.

    The MSM has lost their focus on the mission of the 4th Estate. Here’s a hint to you in the bull pen. It’s not all about ad revenue and warm fuzzies.

  14. 14 Former Federal LEO 1, November 24, 2008 at 1:10 am

    Mike,

    I understand and agree with many of your statements. I still prefer allowing all of the MSN’s ambivalent muckraking because the strongest candidates will eventually survive. I would rather see many good persons assailed by turncoat MSN biasedness than allowing one Sarah Palin-like demagogue to escape the exposure of her true character.

    The American citizenry is slowly becoming more adept at sorting out fact from fiction. The general populace will began to see the style of hypocrisy you mentioned and then ignore the worst of the baseless character assassinations bandied about by the MSN.

  15. 15 Jill 1, November 24, 2008 at 9:56 am

    Mike and FFLEO,

    I think you both make excellent points. If the press did its true and best job Sara Palin would be exposed and there would be no need to destroy her in the sense Mike describes. Every politician deserves real scrutiny as FFLEO says.

    The trouble comes when, as Mike pointed out, the press no longer performs the work of honest scrutiny. Instead it moves to either bizarrely build up or tear down the person of their choice. Once they latch on to someone they like, they commit idolatry and will not criticize that person no matter what they do. If they decided they do not like someone, they do go after that person with a vengence.

    The news people seem to consider themselves simultaneously “wise people” and celebrities. Their work revolves around their own vapid personalities and opinions. The amount of real information and investigation available to the public shrinks by the hour. This is so dangerous and destructive of democracy.

  16. 16 Mike Spindell 1, November 24, 2008 at 11:28 am

    Buddha, FFLeo, and Jill,
    We’re all on the same page. In fairness, while I detest the MSM and Punditry, I took great comfort in how the American Public stopped buying the Iraq War propaganda, the wise Bush/Cheney and the lack of experience meme re: Obama. While the cynicism of my intellect says no, the emotional part of me believe that yes, We The People are far smarter collectively than we are given credit for being. It’s the “insiders” from both political parties who feel disdain towards the public they serve. The MSM and the Pundits are like “Courtiers at Court,” willing to change the King’s chamberpot as a sign of their misguided self importance.

  17. 17 Ruth 1, November 14, 2011 at 11:24 pm

    Mr. Turley, I’m guessing that you are liberal?


  1. 1 Thank You Sarah Palin « JONATHAN TURLEY Trackback on 1, November 24, 2008 at 4:35 pm
  2. 2 HAPPY THANKSGIVING!!!!!!!! « JONATHAN TURLEY Trackback on 1, November 27, 2008 at 8:36 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Turley Tweets

Click here to follow the blog on Twitter.

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL OPINION BLOG (2011)

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG (2008)

blawg100_2008_winner9349c7

Winner — Top Opinion Writer By Aspen Institute and The Week Magazine for Best Single-Issue Advocacy (Civil Liberties)

Categories

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 595 other followers