West Point and Religion

Submitted by: Mike Spindell

061410-FlagA young man named Blake Page resigned from West Point this week with five months left to go until graduation. This will no doubt be a life changing event for him and could potentially have drastic consequences. His reason for resigning was his belief that there was a pervasive influence of religious proselytizing at this famed military academy. He and other non-religious cadets are retaliated against for their beliefs and for their refusal to go along with a program that makes Christian Faith the standard for success and for receiving privileges.

He wrote an article for the Huffington Post which I will discuss and link to below. First though I want to add my own thoughts on this because I think this young man is credible and because his charges regarding West Point are not the first complaint of intolerance towards non-religious cadets at a U.S. Armed forces Academy. The U.S. Air force Academy is located in Colorado Springs, Colorado. It is said that this community of 416,000 people can be considered the nexus of Evangelical Christianity in the United States, if not the world.

“Although houses of worship of almost every major world religion can be found in the city, Colorado Springs has in particular attracted a large influx of Evangelical Christians and Christian organizations in recent years. At one time Colorado Springs was counted to be the national headquarters for 81 different religious organizations, earning the city the tongue-in-cheek nickname “the Evangelical Vatican[57] and “The Christian Mecca”.

Religious groups with regional or international headquarters in Colorado Springs include: the Association of Christian Schools International, the Christian and Missionary Alliance, Compassion International, Every Home for Christ, Focus on the Family, HCJB, the International Bible Society, The Navigators, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Colorado Springs, WAY-FM Media Group, Andrew Wommack Ministries, and Young Life.”

In addition to the Air Force Academy there is Fort Carson and two air force bases located in the City. Twenty percent of this County’s employees work for these facilities. Besides this large military presence: “Colorado Springs is home to the United States Olympic Training Center and the headquarters of the United States Olympic Committee. In addition, a number [15] of United States national federations for individual Olympic sports have their headquarters in Colorado Springs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorado_Springs,_Colorado#Religious_institutions

Call me paranoid perhaps, but I think that it is no coincidence that this small city, but sixty miles from Denver, at the base of Pikes Peak, has drawn such a large influx of Evangelical Christians and their national organizations. I think it is potentially an ominous sign and I’ll explain my thoughts and feelings.

There has been a long and troubling history of religious proselytizing at the Air Force Academy (ACA).  In the last two decades as many Evangelical Christians flocked to this city, their efforts to make contact with both Officers, Professors and Cadets has been constant and quite successful. This outreach has also extended to the military bases and airfields in the area. I don’t believe that this interaction is coincidental and I also believe it is an attempt by the Evangelical Christian movement to increase their power by converting the military. A hall mark of the Evangelical Christian movement today is their militancy and their willingness to not only confront, but to exercise power to coerce people into accepting their beliefs. What better source of coercion than having the U.S. Armed Forces in back of you and perhaps subject to your manipulation of religious ideology. Let some of the evidence speak for itself:

“David Mullin, a former AFA economics professor, said military culture muddies the distinction between encouragement and orders, so only chaplains should speak on religious matters. “When a military commander says ‘you are encouraged to attend,’ whether it is to military officers or civilians, that is an effective order,” Mullin said. This constitutes improper proselytism, he added.

A self-described evangelical, Mullin is one of the few to openly criticize what he calls an unhealthy religious climate in the AFA. He is represented in court by the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, a legal watchdog. Mullin was one of five academy professors who sued unsuccessfully in January 2011 to stop a school prayer luncheon that would feature as keynote speaker a veteran who calls himself a “U.S. Marine for Christ.” He alleges his dog was poisoned after he protested about the school’s religious climate later that year.

Mullin suggests part of the problem stems from the AFA’s Colorado Springs location. The city hosts many evangelical parachurch organizations, such as James Dobson’s Focus on the Family, as well as New Life Church, an evangelical church founded by its former pastor Ted Haggard. He added that some of these groups have access to the academy, including cards that get them into dorms. “You have very strong encouragement — basically carte blanche access to cadets by the leadership of the academy by these groups,” Mullin said. “It is corruption, and there is substantial religious discrimination as part of this corruption,” he said. The AFA has long struggled with setting boundaries for religious expression.”

Professor Mullin says the problem stems from the proximity of these church groups, but my suspicions are that the proximity of these church groups is o coincidence, but the result of a concerted to make inroads into the military. The result is the kind of situation described in a column on 10/12/11 by Chris Rodda Senior Research Director, Military Religious Freedom Foundation; Author, ‘Liars For Jesus

“A little over a year ago, a cadet at the Air Force Academy emailed the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) to tell us about an “underground” group of about a hundred Academy cadets who, in order to maintain good standing among their peers and superiors at the Academy, were actually pretending to be fundamentalist Christians. Their charade included leaving Bibles, Christian literature, and Christian music CDs laying around their rooms; attending fundamentalist Christian Bible studies; and feigning devoutness at the Academy’s weekly “Special Programs in Religious Education” (SPIRE) programs. This group of cadets had decided to resort to doing whatever they had to do to play the role of the “right kind” of Christian cadets, all the while living in constant fear of being “outed.”

 In the words of the cadet who wrote to MRFF last year, who described himself as “kind of the leader” of this underground group: “If any of us gave even the slightest indication that we weren’t one of their number, our lives would be even more miserable than they already are due to the fact that we are all living lies here. Despite the Cadet Honor Code we all lie about our lives. We have to.”

Who makes up this group of over a hundred cadets who feel that they must pretend to be such devoted fundamentalist Christians? Well, surprisingly, they are mostly Christians — both mainline Protestants and Catholics — who aren’t “Christian enough” or the “right kind” of Christians for the AirForceAcademy. The rest of the group is made up of other assorted heathens, which include members of non-Christian religions, agnostics, and atheists.” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-rodda/air-force-academy-cadets-_b_1007411.html

Imagine if you will, a Cadet at the AFA, who is a perhaps a Presbyterian, Unitarian, Catholic, or a Jew, who feels this pressure to be seen as faithfully religious. You are already trying to adapt yourself to a hierarchal military system that emphasizes following your superior’s orders. What if your Superior hints strongly that they will think better of you if you are seen to be religiously faithful? What do you do? Obviously, as shown above some people, unable to stand up to the stress and pressures of conformity, in a system which requires it, will “fake it” to get by. What happens though to those who don’t fake it? How do we quantify that number among those who are booted out, ranked at the bottom of their class, or leave the Academy with an unfavorable notation in their permanent military record? It’s really not possible to make such a calculation and so we must infer it. Also from HuffPost and Chris Rodda on 10/29/10:

“The AirForceAcademy reversed course on Friday and released the results of a survey that showed mixed results on the school’s efforts to improve religious and racial tolerance and limit sexual harassment.

The survey, conducted in December and January, showed improvements in making minority groups feel more accepted and in reducing the number who say they feel pressured by others to participate in religious activities.

But it found that many cadets believe that some religious and racial minorities face discrimination and harassment, and an increasing percentage of the faculty and staff believe that sexual harassment occurs at the school.

The academy superintendent, Lt. Gen. Michael Gould, said the survey overall shows that many of the school’s tolerance initiatives are effective but that improvement is needed.

Gould initially declined to make the results public, saying the were a “commander’s tool” best used internally.” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/29/air-force-proselytizing-christianity-evangelicals_n_775859.html

The title of the HuffPost article though is “41% of Non-Christian Air Force Cadets Cite Proselytizing” Despite Superintendent Gould’s assurances that things were improving there, more exists in this story:

“Several groups filed Freedom of Information Act requests for the data, including The Associated Press. Rep. Mike Coffman, R-Colo., also pushed Gould to go public.”

 “Coffman said Friday he’s still not convinced Gould understands his responsibility to be open with the public. “I think at the Air Force Academy, they need a remedial course in American government,” he said. Coffman said the military as a whole abuses its power to keep secrets and sometimes withholds information from the public because it’s embarrassing, not because of security concerns.

One of the groups that submitted a FOIA request for the survey, the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, asked to have a representative at a briefing Gould conducted Friday but was turned down. Academy officials said the briefing was for media and that the foundation would be mailed the documents it requested. Mikey Weinstein, founder and president of the foundation, accused the Air Force of reneging on an invitation it had extended to his foundation and said Gould was trying to muffle opposition. Weinstein said the religious climate at the academy is worse than Gould portrays it. He said he has heard from 172 cadets, faculty and staff at the academy who say they face religious pressure, mostly from evangelical Christians at the school, and are afraid to complain for fear of reprisals.”

Another article also references the situation that exists at the AFA:

“An underground group of cadets says yes, and they say they have to pretend to be fundamentalists so they will be considered cadets in good standing. Mainline Protestant and Catholics, they say, are not considered “Christian enough.” A survery of the climate at the U.S. Air Force Academy, based in Colorado Springs, showed need for improvement. The Military Religious Freedom Foundation says that nearly one in 5 of the cadets questioned reported being the target of unwanted proselytizing, and 23 cadets — 13 of whom are self-identified Christians — say they feared for their physical safety, given their religious beliefs. You can read more here.” http://blogs.courant.com/susan_campbell/2010/09/is-the-air-force-academy-under.html

There is frankly too much material on the religious problems at the AFA for me to present more than all the links listed above. In the interests of fairness I will list some more links below that shows that many Evangelicals have a different viewpoint. If you would like that viewpoint then please click the following links: http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?id=36782 and: http://www.opposingviews.com/i/religion/christianity/air-force-academy-caves-anti-christian-activist and: http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2011/11/air_force_acade.html.

The title of this piece is “West Point and Religion” and my opening paragraph dealt with the resignation of Blake Page from West Point five months before he was due to graduate. I’ll let him explain why:

“As the President of the West Point Secular Student Alliance (SSA), a Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers (MAAF) affiliate, and first Director of Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) Affairs at West Point, I have been in a position to hear countless cadets recount their personal stories of frustration in dealing with the ongoing oppressive and unconstitutional bigotry they face for being non-religious. Cadets often come to me to seek assistance, guidance and reassurance in response to instances of debasing harassment. Many here are regularly told they do not deserve a place in the military. They are shown through policy that the Constitution guarantees their freedom of, but not from religion. Many are publically chastised for seeking out a community of likeminded people because it is such a common belief that Humanism and other non-religious philosophies are inherently immoral and worse. “

“The title West Point Graduate carries a great deal of weight in this world. Those who earn it are given a “golden ticket” and wear a “ring of power” which will certainly carry them to successful careers with doors flung open in the military, in business, even in personal relationships; as so many are seduced by the historic prestige of the United States Military Academy. All of these things seem enticing, but for me personally they are not worth it. As I write this, I am five months from graduation. After nearly three and a half years here, there is no reason to suspect that I would be in any way incapable of completing the final requirements and walking across the stage in Michie Stadium with diploma in hand in another 174 days. Choosing to resign at this point also carries significant risk. The Army may seek recoupment in the form of about $200-300k which I will personally owe, or an additional term of up to 5 years of enlisted service. What could possibly compel me to pass over this incredible opportunity in exchange for such harsh penalties?”

“While there are certainly numerous problems with the developmental program at West Point and all service academies, the tipping point of my decision to resign was the realization that countless officers here and throughout the military are guilty of blatantly violating the oaths they swore to defend the Constitution. These men and women are criminals, complicit in light of day defiance of the Uniform Code of Military Justice through unconstitutional proselytism, discrimination against the non-religious and establishing formal policies to reward, encourage and even at times require sectarian religious participation. These transgressions are nearly always committed in the name of fundamentalist evangelical Christianity. The sparse leaders who object to these egregious violations are relegated to the position of silent bystanders, because they understand all too well the potential ramifications of publically expressing their loyalty to the laws of our country. These are strong words that I do not use lightly, but after years of clear personal observation I am certain that they are true.” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/blake-page/west-point-religious-freedom_b_2232279.html

Considering the pressures, possible dangers and the sacrifice this young man is making by resigning from West Point I find his story credible and at the same time by linking it to what is occurring at the Air Force Academy, chilling from a Constitutional perspective. My belief is that many, but not all, of those who are in what is deemed “The Evangelical Christian Movement” are radicals cut from the same cloth as the “Islamic Fanatics” that many in this country fear and despise. This includes the James Dobson’s, Ralph Reeds, Franklin Grahams and Pat Robertson’s. They espouse a form of Christianity that is militant, intolerant and thirsting for power over all. The have amassed great wealth and have supported some of the most regressively radical politicians in this country. As we now see they are trying to extend their tentacles into the Military. If they succeed to any large degree we will indeed be at risk of this country turning into an oppressive theocracy. Will they succeed? Will we let them overturn our Constitution and substitute a Christian simulacrum of “Sharia Law”. What do you think? Am I indeed paranoid?

Submitted by: Michael Spindell, guest blogger.

121 thoughts on “West Point and Religion”

  1. There are many types of psychopaths….. But one thing in common they lack a sense of right and wrong as it is commonly defined…

  2. “Is religion the greatest achievement of the sociopathic personality and readily recognized as such by the sociopaths who pick-up the devise?” … like the Pentagon

  3. Mike,

    When you’re seeking power you write the history that serves you best…. What a lot of folks are unaware is that there are almost 3 centuries between the first synopsis and the last. And they are not in chronological order either…..

  4. Mike,

    Or Paul was the next sociopath to come along and “steal” the good thing Jesus and his brothers had going.

  5. John A March,

    I think that you are not knowledgeable of young men nor the effects of christian (or other types for that matter) proselytizing.
    Citing examples as MikeS or I would do, is always dangerous and can be challenged just as you rightfully do.
    However, I think that there are sufficient studies made which confirm this take on the problem.
    Just in general, how much is this society plagued by dropouts for idealistic reasons. As to their fates, it need not be negative. Being a four-star ass-kisser is not always the heighth of happiness.

  6. Gene,

    I’m questioning all those who claimed “TO KNOW” and sought to teach others that which had only been revealed to them. That would include Abrahm and Jesus. As for Jesus not wanting to establish a church … that’s from the gospels which were concocted well after the fact and were certainly not in existence during the time of Peter or Paul. History rewritten. as it were. Paul never mentioned any of the “favorite” gospel stories in his letters and he knew Peter and James so ….

    As to the Buddha, I don’t know enough about him to argue the point but I’m highly suspicious.

    Is religion the greatest achievement of the sociopathic personality and readily recognized as such by the sociopaths who pick-up the devise?

  7. “And I forgot to name … how in the world I could forget is beyond me … good old Paul. The Jew with Roman citizenship who persecuted Christian then was blinded and became one of the great “I KNOW; FOLLOW ME” characters.”

    Blouise,

    Paul claimed to be Jewish and Pharisee trained, but that is historically suspect. Check out Hyam Maccoby’s (biblical scholar) “The Mythmaker”, written about Paul, where he demolishes Paul’s connection to the disciples and followers of Jesus. His contention is that Paul was the creator of Christianity as we know it and it was a religion that would be foreign to Jesus and his followers.

  8. Elaine,

    And I forgot to name … how in the world I could forget is beyond me … good old Paul. The Jew with Roman citizenship who persecuted Christian then was blinded and became one of the great “I KNOW; FOLLOW ME” characters. So much so that Jesus’ brothers despised him for draining monetary support from their movement and who’s sect was the one picked up by Constantine who had his own vision of the cross in victorious battle!

    As to Marx, “It is the opium of the people.” … that’s the peoples’ problem … the good would be good and the evil would be evil without any religion?

    I can’t support or deny the existence of a higher power but I question the real motives of people like Abrahm (Those of the Jewish faith will recognize that I didn’t use the Abraham spelling), Jesus, Mohammad etc. Were they sociopathic personalities?

  9. The Christian jihadists pervade all power structures in our government. Consider the number of Congress people; the state governments, legislators and governors, the military, and the members of MSM that provide cover. It is truly scary.

    We have seen that women have no status, the poor, disabled and elderly have no status. We are disposable. All union workers are disposable. To be useful they need to be willing to work for poverty wages. Black, Hispanic and poor white men are disposable. Well, actually, they aren’t all disposable. Some of them come in handy in the for-profit prisons working as slave labor.

    There’s the advent of drones, the escalation of militarization of the police (at-the-ready swat teams, riot gear, military gear, tasers), the SYG laws, TSA, complete and total eavesdropping on everyone, cameras everywhere, chips in our driver’s license, Presidential “kill” list, indefinite detention without charges, and as this thread points out so well, a required oppressive religion that holds only God responsible for our actions. George Orwell, it this what you meant?

  10. Blouise,

    “Abrahm, Jesus, Mohammed, Luther, Henry VIII, Joseph Smith, Mary Baker Eddy, L. Ron Hubbard etc … are they sociopaths?”

    Abraham? Too remote in time to say as little or nothing is known of the historical person. Jesus and Luther though? Probably not by DSM or WHO criteria. Jesus was far too empathetic in his teachings unlike many who claimed to follow him. Plus he never sought to be worshipped himself but rather – like Luther – was rebelling against established orthodoxy in advocating others to adopt a more personal relationship with their sense of God. Similar could be said of Buddha, who the historical person would probably be repelled by those who worship him instead of simply taking his wise council just as the historical Jesus would. Peter was probably a sociopath though. He was interested in controlling people just as Constantine after him. The rest of them? You could also argue the inherently top down control oriented features of Mohammed’s teachings could indicate a psychopath as opposed to a sociopath. But L. Ron and Smith with their focus on materialism being a prime requisite in “supporting their beliefs” reek of Ponzi scheme from the get go. Henry was the very portrait of a sociopath even if he hadn’t founded the Anglican Church. Eddy? Hard to say. Even Mark Twain noted of her, “We cannot peacefully agree as to her motives, therefore her character must remain crooked to some of us and straight to the others.”

  11. “Mike, I would say your piece, and the font of essays and videos it has ushered in, is a call to urgent action if ever I heard one.”

    James,

    That is exactly why this aged hippie spends may hours daily here and on the Internet, when I’m really more of a fun-loving type of guy. I’ve got kids and grand-kids and friends and family and empathy for all of us in the human condition. I worry about all our fates in this perilous life.

  12. “Was he right?”

    Elaine,

    Marx made some valid points about religion. I wonder though if he realized that his own ideas would be formed into a secular religion, every bit as cynical and destructive as that which he sought solutions. My own take is that all “Isms” are flawed attempts at trying to solve humanity’s problems. The flaw is in trying to come up with an overarching solution for a multiplicity of problems and having that solution turned into dogma by the sociopaths who claim discipleship to the “prophet”. In this instance the “religious” leaders have molded their version of Christianity into a “warriors Creed” that would appeal to the military. That people like Dobson and Graham, sociopaths both, assume the mantle of understanding the divine, is the essence of their sociopathy. To postulate a supreme creator of this entire Universe, with the belief that you personally can understand the wishes of that creator, is both ego-maniacal and sociopathic.

  13. Mike, I would say your piece, and the font of essays and videos it has ushered in, is a call to urgent action if ever I heard one. We have been conditioned not to question those “who believe.” But this is not belief that we witness. This is demanding permission to kill, and those who deny it shall be killed. This desire is now heavily funded with tentacles everywhere, a Rapturous Beast as such.

    We must act.

  14. Blouise,

    Something to ponder:

    Is religion the opium of the people?
    Was Karl Marx right to characterise faith in the way he did?
    6/29/09
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/jun/26/religion-philosophy

    This week, revellers and thinkers gather in London to celebrate Marxist thought at the annual “festival of resistance”. Marx, of course, famously disparaged religion as “the opium of the people”. He wrote, at length, that

    “Religion is, indeed, the self-consciousness and self-esteem of man who has either not yet won through to himself, or has already lost himself again. But man is no abstract being squatting outside the world. Man is the world of man – state, society. This state and this society produce religion, which is an inverted consciousness of the world, because they are an inverted world. Religion is the general theory of this world, its encyclopedic compendium, its logic in popular form, its spiritual point d’honneur, its enthusiasm, its moral sanction, its solemn complement, and its universal basis of consolation and justification. It is the fantastic realisation of the human essence since the human essence has not acquired any true reality. The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.

    “Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.

    “The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions. The criticism of religion is, therefore, in embryo, the criticism of that vale of tears of which religion is the halo.”

    Was he right?

  15. Elaine,

    Two years ago I would have agreed with you but as I have looked closer at the beginnings of all these religions and the paths they have followed down through the centuries, I see a common thread of sociopathicism (my totally made up word) that starts with the “follow me” directive which is part and parcel of each major religious movement.

    I have intimate knowledge of people inside and outside of religion doing evil and doing good and I’m also not supporting, one way or the other, the existence of a higher power … I’m questioning the founders … the “I KNOW; FOLLOW ME” people:

    Abrahm, Jesus, Mohammed, Luther, Henry VIII, Joseph Smith, Mary Baker Eddy, L. Ron Hubbard etc … are they sociopaths?

  16. Elaine,
    Wouldn’t it be better if the troops in Afghanistan just come home? They can do all the converting to Christianity right here at the military academies!

Comments are closed.