London and the world is reeling from the video from yesterday of two Muslim men who killed and mutilated the body of an English soldier and then asked people to film them as they raved about their atrocity. The men reportedly screamed “Allah Akbar” as they butchered the soldier. A man now identified as Michael Adebolajo is shown promising onlookers that “you and your kids will be next.” In the midst of this horror scene however there was inspirational moments including a woman who gets off her bus to confront Abebolajo covered in blood and holding a meat cleaver.
In the disturbing video below, Abebolajo proclaims “The only reason we have killed this man today is because Muslims are dying daily by British soldiers.” Of course, he did not have the courage to confront the soldier head on. He hit him with his car before butchering him and posing for YouTube. Abebolajo is shown telling viewers “Remove your governments – they don’t care about you. You think David Cameron is going to get caught in the street when we start bursting our guns? You think politicians are going to die?”
He warns that more will die and “No, it’s going to be the average guy, like you, and your children. So get rid of them – tell them to bring our troops back so we can… so you can all live in peace.” Abebolajo is known by the Muslim name Mujahid. He adopts the same excuse used throughout the ages by those who use religion to justify their blood lust: “We swear by the almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you until you leave us alone. We must fight them as they fight us. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.”
He then added a bizarre claim of regret . . . not for the murder of course but the women watching: “I apologise that women have had to witness this today, but in our land our women have to see the same. You people will never be safe. Remove your government, they don’t care about you.”
It was in this disgusting scene of religious violence that a true representative stepped forward. She is mother-of-two Ingrid Loyau-Kennett and was on a bus when the scene unfolded. She got off the bus and, when others were walking by or cowering, she walked up to the killer and demanded that he stop.
One of the killers insisted “We want to start a war in London tonight,” but she replied calmly “Right now it is only you versus many people, you are going to lose.”
Yes they will Ingrid, but it is because for every grotesque monster like these two men, we have Ingrid Loyau-Kennett and human beings like her.
Max-1 if you include more than 2 links it will be sent to moderation hell. “Jews” is not a word flagged by the blawg-owner. WordPress has been doing strange things with the posts lately. We are all being plagued. There has also been a lot of spam so the spam filters are working overtime and posts are being held up for no discernible reason. Re-post and edit out all but 2 links if that is the problem. Add the other links to subsequent postings.
My comment is pending…
… Wrote jooos the proper way.
“these people”
“them”
“their religion”
Are we still bitching about the Jews burning thus Reichstag, or what?(!)
I agree with Chicagodog. Yo. Dog. If you want to come join our dogpac down here at the marina in FL let us know.
i wonder how many muslims or brown people who might be muslims will die in street violence because of this.
Yep, if we leave these people alone and don’t attack them, they will be nice to us. Just like they are nice to their women and children.
Chicagodog:
The British wouldnt have gone along with that 80 years ago. Their culture is infected with bad philosophy which has made them impotent in the face of this threat. A vaccination of John Locke would get them healthy again.
“Sec. 18. This makes it lawful for a man to kill a thief, who has not in the least hurt him, nor declared any design upon his life, any farther than, by the use of force, so to get him in his power, as to take away his money, or what he pleases, from him; because using force, where he has no right, to get me into his power, let his pretence be what it will, I have no reason to suppose, that he, who would take away my liberty, would not, when he had me in his power, take away every thing else. And therefore it is lawful for me to treat him as one who has put himself into a state of war with me, i.e. kill him if I can; for to that hazard does he justly expose himself, whoever introduces a state of war, and is aggressor in it.
Sec. 19. And here we have the plain difference between the state of nature and the state of war, which however some men have confounded, are as far distant, as a state of peace, good will, mutual assistance and preservation, and a state of enmity, malice, violence and mutual destruction, are one from another. Men living together according to reason, without a common superior on earth, with authority to judge between them, is properly the state of nature. But force, or a declared design of force, upon the person of another, where there is no common superior on earth to appeal to for relief, is the state of war: and it is the want of such an appeal gives a man the right of war even against an aggressor, tho’ he be in society and a fellow subject. Thus a thief, whom I cannot harm, but by appeal to the law, for having stolen all that I am worth, I may kill, when he sets on me to rob me but of my horse or coat; because the law, which was made for my preservation, where it cannot interpose to secure my life from present force, which, if lost, is capable of no reparation, permits me my own defence, and the right of war, a liberty to kill the aggressor, because the aggressor allows not time to appeal to our common judge, nor the decision of the law, for remedy in a case where the mischief may be irreparable. Want of a common judge with authority, puts all men in a state of nature: force without right, upon a man’s person, makes a state of war, both where there is, and is not, a common judge.”
http://www.constitution.org/jl/2ndtr03.htm
These men are total gutter rats- but its very sad to see people in London being so pacifist. Just bystanders. These men would have had their butts kicked in the US. People would have put their bodies on the line for this man. Not just stood around. The criminals are more free than the citizens in England. The criminals have the guns and the weapons. The Citizens are helpless while London police and big government cannot protect them.
Sorry I missed your train of thought, Dredd. I should have known it was about Churchill and oil.
My comment to guys like Piers Morgan is this. If Brits had handguns someone could have shot this pug on the street while he was preaching.
Every night we have CNN with this Piers dork telling America it is wrong to bear arms. It might be wrong to arm bears but it aint wrong to bear arms.
God is Good. God is Great. Akbar and all that.
So, why did Britain let this nut into their borders in the first place?
Why did the U.S. let the Tsarboys into the U.S. in the first place?
Why do we need emigrants from Chechnia, Armenia, and Tsarboy states?
Close the borders and start over.
A couple of inks, the Scahill link is very interesting. But it’s ok, as randyjet said above, we pay blood money to the families (if there are survivors) if we kill the wrong people and get caught doing it so no harm, no foul.
http://www.propublica.org/article/everything-we-know-so-far-about-drone-strikes
This is Jeremy Scahill talking about the war within the war and JSOC’s role, played out daily, actually nightly:
Radicalized guys seeking self help for their cause is what this looks like so far. I’m surprised that we haven’t seen more of this in the UK and US. I got to see the entire video before it was edited and the guy talking didn’t seem to be a crazy person. He didn’t have those “Manson eyes” as so many killers do. He was just pi**ed off and fed up. His mission was clear, tit for tat and like he says in the censored portion of his statement, it’s not going to be David Cameron caught out in the street when the guns go off, it’s the little people. Because it’s always the little people.
That there has always been a tension between the arrogance of the Muslim faith and the Christian faith and that that is the root of this act is too easy. It ignores the last 35 something years of policy starting with the CIA arming and funding OBL to fight against the Russians in Afghanistan. 911 is rooted in Saudi and American cooperation after the first Gulf War and OBL’s break with the house of Saud over it. What is happening in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Pakistan and who knows where else in the Mid East is that people- some that hate the West and would do us harm just ’cause but most that are just little people like us and our UK neighbors- are living in terror and being killed daily.
Many of us have said for years that our own policy over the years was constructing a generation of enemies, was a great recruiting tool for alQieda and militant groups. So it is with our UK neighbors. We have been on the same side and/or actively working for similar ends for the entire of those 35 years. Same for UK policy. This killer is part of that generation many of us worried about and predicted on this very blawg IMO.
These vids contain the parts ITV has edited out:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=64f_1369272177
Q U E S T I O N:
When a Christian murders an abortion doctor and cites the Bible and FOXNews it’s called a violent assault and murder…
… When a Muslim commits a violent act and cites the Quran western media/blogs call it TERRORISM!!!
Why are we in the business of redefining criminal acts…
… So as to justify the vitriol some harbor towards other faiths?
Are we really that different than Nazi Brownshirts when we engage in such liable. How was this act going to intimidate a whole nation into submission? Shock and awe, anyone?
The person citing the bible giving him a presumed reason kill perverts scripture to a fairtheewell. The Muslim following the Quran is doing what the book says with no possible misinterpretation. Both are terrorists. Both are ungodly. Both are not Christians. Both give what they have which is death in their soul. Both need to repent to be a Christian. Both disobey all of the commands Jesus kept.
nick spinelli 1, May 23, 2013 at 4:36 pm
Dredd, I get your black on white beef and agree conditionally. Black on black is hardly ever “newsworthy.” However, the BEHEADING has something to do w/ it, as does the gruesome video. If there were a video of a Crip w/ a meat cleaver in his bloody hand, and a headless Blood in the background, it would be newsworthy. “If it bleeds it leads.”
=============================================
The Crips, the Bloods, they got no oil bro.
If it leads to oil it leads … (BTW the book I quote from up-thread, about Winston Churchill, is written by your bud John Boy McCain) …
Them muslins got our oil under their soil … they should know better than to do that … so “there will be blood” …
Welcome to the new age:
Dredd, I get your black on white beef and agree conditionally. Black on black is hardly ever “newsworthy.” However, the BEHEADING has something to do w/ it, as does the gruesome video. If there were a video of a Crip w/ a meat cleaver in his bloody hand, and a headless Blood in the background, it would be newsworthy. “If it bleeds it leads.”
This story would have received no press whatsoever if it was The Crips and The Bloods slashing it out.
It go press because of … well do you know why yet folks?
The cripes and the bloods would be on the same soil. With this it is one terrorist from another country saying the other from another country is a terrorist denying they are one themselves. Both sides are using the same method of kill as an answer. When will people learn that kill is never an answer?
anonymously posted 1, May 23, 2013 at 12:51 pm
…
We need to recognise that, given the continued role our government has chosen to play in the US imperial project in the Middle East, we are lucky that these attacks are so few and far between.”
…
===================================
Oh those Brits.
We are a family separated by a common language for sure.
Winston Churchill when he was a wee lad as Lord of the Admiralty just before the First World War, changed the largest and most powerful Navy in the world, the Navy of the British Empire, to oil.
At a time when England had little to no oil (coal was their thing then).
Knowing that such a move mandated British (read “Western”) control of the Middle East:
(The Universal Smedley – 2). We followed the Brits into the Middle East circa 1900 so as to control the oil.
And that Brit guy says nothing of their instigation of the whole thing … he just says “our government has chosen to play in the US imperial project in the Middle East”?
What up wid dat?
Oh the arrogance I tells ya.
Disgusting story and my heart goes out to the family of this victim. These individuals are the lowest of the low and should never leave their cells.
betty:
““Bad” Muslims for instigating the crusades.”
*******************
To my knowledge, not one American every fought in that other fundamentalist group’s war, the Crusades.