Former FBI Director James Comey sat down for a remarkable interview on CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360” this week. The interview was able to evade any mention of the findings of misconduct and false statements made by Comey. It was impressive how in a target rich environment CNN was still able to hit the small spaces between the scandals.
Cooper cut to the chase and raised the current campaign for president. Comey did not disappoint and declared Trump a “threat to the rule of law.”
I do not object to Comey voicing such an opinion. Comey then went further to declare that the GOP was now a “cult” and held forth on the need to protect the rule of law against political bias.
For those of us who have been long critics of Comey, the interview was almost a mocking parody.
Comey recently celebrated the indictment of Trump by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg despite even some liberal experts denouncing the charges as a political prosecution. The political weaponization of the criminal justice system was declared by Comey to be “a good day.”
The former FBI director, who has been teaching and speaking on government ethics, joined others in celebrating the upcoming arrest of Trump because nothing says “ethical leadership” like a patently political prosecution.
Comey declined to prosecute Hillary Clinton on her email scandal despite finding that she violated federal rules and handled classified material “carelessly.”
He declared, “Ethical leaders lead by seeing above the short term, above the urgent or the partisan, and with a higher loyalty to lasting values, most importantly the truth.”
Yet now Comey is heralding a raw political prosecution.
Cooper also did not ask Comey about the blistering report of Special Counsel John Durham on the repeated failure of his own leadership in pushing an investigation without sufficient evidence. Under his leadership, the FBI took a false Russian collusion theory pushed by the Clinton campaign and continued the investigation despite early refutation of the underlying sources and claims. That included warnings from American intelligence that the agency was using suspected Russian disinformation funneled through the Clinton campaign.
During the Sussmann trial, it was revealed that an agent told colleagues that FBI leadership, including then-Director James Comey, was “fired up” about the alleged secret communications channel between the Trump Organization and Russia’s Alfa Bank. That was also a false allegation created and pushed by the Clinton campaign.
It was Comey who was fired after former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein cited him for “serious mistakes” and violating “his obligation to ‘preserve, protect and defend’ the traditions of the Department and the FBI.”
It was Comey who violated federal laws and removed FBI material (including reported classified material) after being fired and then leaked information to the media.
None of that was relevant to an interview on allegations of misconduct at the FBI and protecting the rule of law.
It was akin to interviewing Joseph Hazelwood on good maritime practices without mentioning the Exxon Valdez.
For Comey, it was just another “good day” in the media.
Dear Prof. Turley,
I vividly recall Comey’s final report to congress. A ‘nothingburger’, to say the least. I was shocked by how little he seemed to understand about the basic facts of his own report.
It appears congress is ‘moving’ to hold current FBI Dir. Wrey in contempt .. . and I’m quite sure the feeling is mutual.
Dir Wrey is quite willing to ‘work’ with congress .. . but possession, and the Office of Legal Counsel, is 9/10th the law.
This could all work its way through the courts in less than 5 years. .. if we’re lucky.
*the ‘blistering’ Durham Report ‘nothingburger’ is a classic ‘catch 22’. .. The Report eschews the creation of any new laws or procedures in favor of enforcing existing ones.
Do we all know that these campaigns originate in the propaganda and indoctrination departments of adversarial, global, communist governments, and by the efforts of individual globalists?
Do we all know that they originate in the agencies of, and from individuals allied with, the enemy?
All individuals and organizations that further the designs of enemy campaigns are engaging “…in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
American individuals and administrative and functional structures that engage “…in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort…” are committing espionage, intervention in internal affairs and constitutional treason against America.
It is long past time they were prosecuted for such.
I’m now starting to feel sorry for you Turley, because you are such a patehtic political pawn of the Hate Network. The title of your piece says “Alleged Violation of the Rule of Law”… and you know that the disciples didn’t pick up on this qualifier that you have to use to keep from getting sued. Let’s see now, you say “The former FBI director, who has been teaching and speaking on government ethics, joined others in celebrating the upcoming arrest of Trump because nothing says “ethical leadership” like a patently political prosecution.” “PATENTLY POLITICAL”? What’s “patently political” about charging Trump over the Stormy Daniels payments when his attorney, Michael Cohen, was sentenced to 3 years for campaign finance violations, tax evasion and lying to the FBI onTrump’s behalf over hush-money payments to Stormy Daniels that were charged off as campaign expenses? Why should Cohen be the only one going to the slammer over this? Why shouldn’t the one who benefitted also be charged, and why should charging Trump with the same crimes Cohen was convicted of be politically-motivated?
Then, you actually use the words “false Russian collusion theory pushed by the Clinton campaign”. You know this isn’t true, Turley, so why do you say this? I know why–because this is a lie frequently told by your employer. The “Russian collusion theory” was PROVEN, not just by the Mueller investigation that yielded dozens of criminal prosecutions, but also by a REPUBLICAN Senate Committee that investigated the matter and found that the Trump campaign did feed insider polling information for the use of Russian hackers to spread lies by Hillary Clinton, AND, the investigation was started when an Australian diplomat informed the FBI that he was told by Papadopoulos that Russians had hacked into the servers of the DNC and Hillary Clinton. THAT’S how the investigation got started, and it’s neither false nor politically-motivated.
Lastly, and most pathetically, you cite the Durham nothingburger report as some sort of proof that Comey did something illegal:”Cooper also did not ask Comey about the blistering report of Special Counsel John Durham on the repeated failure of his own leadership in pushing an investigation without sufficient evidence. Under his leadership, the FBI took a false Russian collusion theory pushed by the Clinton campaign and continued the investigation despite early refutation of the underlying sources and claims. That included warnings from American intelligence that the agency was using suspected Russian disinformation funneled through the Clinton campaign.” “Blistering report”? Durham was charged with finding something, anything to use to criticize the FBI because it investigated the pig. That was his mission, and that’s what he did. He tried two cases and lost both of them, and couldn’t even come up with any recommendations for charging anyone else.
So, tell us, Turley, WHAT “alleged crimes” did Comey commit? Who’s to say what constitutes “sufficient evidence” to pursue a criminal investigation and how does pursuing such an investigation constitute a crime? How does a supposed “repeated failure of….leadership” constitute a crime, and if so WHAT crime? You don’t say.
You are a law professor, and it’s this credential that you are trading on by making up nonexistent “crimes” based on the FBI pursuing a criminal investigation on allegedly insufficient evidence, and for an alleged “failure of leadership”. You know that both of these things are purely subjective, and no crime is involved. And, why are you doing these things? As a distraction away from Trump’s actual crimes, proof of which is in the public domain. It’s pathetic, Turley.
Obama’s Conflict Tanked the Clinton E-mail Investigation — As Predictedd
By Andrew C. McCarthy
September 26, 2016 8:00 AM
Hillary couldn’t be proven guilty without proving the president guilty as well.
‘How is this not classified?”
So exclaimed Hillary Clinton’s close aide and confidante, Huma Abedin. The FBI had just shown her an old e-mail exchange, over Clinton’s private account, between the then-secretary of state and a second person, whose name Abedin did not recognize. The FBI then did what the FBI is never supposed to do: The agents informed their interviewee (Abedin) of the identity of the second person. It was the president of the United States, Barack Obama, using a pseudonym to conduct communications over a non-secure e-mail system — something anyone with a high-level security clearance, such as Huma Abedin, would instantly realize was a major breach.
– National Review
The classification, declassification and archiving of material is a function of the executive branch.
The legislative branch has no power to usurp the power of the executive branch.
No legislation that usurps the power of the executive branch and delivers that power to the legislative branch is constitutional.
Classified material is solely the purview of the President.
No president may commit crimes of subversion, espionage, treason or any other crimes against the United States using classified material.
“I’m now starting to feel sorry for you Turley . . .”
Here’s a sure bet: If she (?) feels sorry for someone, be proud of that person.
” “Alleged Violation of the Rule of Law”… and you know that the disciples didn’t pick up on this qualifier that you have to use to keep from getting sued.”
Dropped the alleged – I am fine with that. No one is suing. While there are SOME things that are not proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
There are many things that ARE.
The election rigging that is part of the coverup – is PROVEN.
FBI, CIA, DHS, otehr alpahbet agencies, as well a sgovenrment contractors, adn government funded NGO’s intefered with the US 2020 election by seeking to supress political viewpoints they disagreed with and by seeking to supress damaging truths.
That is election rigging.
“What’s “patently political” about charging Trump over the Stormy Daniels payments”
The fact that it is not a crime.
“Michael Cohen, was sentenced to 3 years for campaign finance violations”
Cohen plead quilty to many things including lying to congress. It is common practice to get defendants to plead to lots of crimes – even ones they did not commit.
Regardless, Cohen plead on the theory that Cohen made the Payments himself – not Trump or the Trump campaign.
Cohen’s gulty plea makes Bragg’s prosution impossible. If Cohen paid Daniels himself – then Trump’s payments to Cohen are legal fees.
BTW that was the ONLY charge related to Daniels. The rest were related to his congressional tetimony and to his taxi business in NYC which did not involve Trump at all.
“Why should Cohen be the only one going to the slammer over this?”
Because Cohen is the one with the miltimillion dollar Taxi Medalion Fraud scheme.
There is not an actual crime involving Danials and Cohen and Trump.
It is legal to pay people to remain silent. They are not obligated to do so, they are not obligated to take the money.
“The “Russian collusion theory” was PROVEN”
NJope it was actually DISPROVEN.
The only campaign colluding with Russians was the Clinton Campaign.
“not just by the Mueller investigation that yielded dozens of criminal prosecutions”
Not dozens, and not a single successful prosecution of anyone even related to Russia regarding the Election.
Mueller lost – he could not even get into court because he could not provide the judge with the very low standard of evidence needed to get through the door of a courthouse, on ANY charges involving Russian election interference.
“also by a REPUBLICAN Senate Committee that investigated the matter and found that the Trump campaign did feed insider polling information for the use of Russian hackers to spread lies by Hillary Clinton”
Nope. Not a crime, not true, and a ludicrously stupid claim.
Kliminick was a tripple agent, HE worked for Russia, And the US state department.
Manafort was npot aware he was working for anyone.
Separetely anyone who wants can buy polling data – including Russians.
Multiple investigations – including by Twitter have found NO election inteferance
This whole claim fell completely apart.
“the investigation was started when an Australian diplomat informed the FBI that he was told by Papadopoulos that Russians had hacked into the servers of the DNC and Hillary Clinton. THAT’S how the investigation got started”
Correct, and the FBI interviewed Amb. Downer and Papadoulis within days of opening the investigation and found the claim was FALSE.
The claimed exchange did not take place.
But for the Steele Dossier the invvestigation would have died right there.
“Lastly, and most pathetically, you cite the Durham nothingburger report as some sort of proof that Comey did something illegal”
You swell on the Senate investigation – which Contra your claim found nothing.
Mueller than found nothing. and then call Durham which found massive corruption inside goverment a nothing burger.
Are you actually OK with the conduct of the DOJ and FBI that Durham found ?
Are you OK with massive political bias driving the decisions of who to prosecute and who not to, and even whether a crime existed or not ?
As to Comey – those of you on the left Blamed comey for Thowing the 2016 election to Trump.
It should be irrelevant whether you are republican or Democrat – it should be trivial to Grasp that CVomey is immoral and unethical and self serving.
What really damns YOU is that Because Comey is now maligning Trump constantly – he has rehabilitated himself in your eyes and you can ignore his prior malfeasance.
Comey was a disaster – While Comey’s Bias leaned towards Democrats – James Comey’s primary Bias was James Comey.
This man is not someone who should be teaching ethics. He is an example of someone without ethics.
“Blistering report”? Durham was charged with finding something, anything to use to criticize the FBI because it investigated the pig. That was his mission, and that’s what he did.”
And he FOUND political corruption.
“He tried two cases and lost both of them, and couldn’t even come up with any recommendations for charging anyone else.”
He should not have lost the Sussman case – Sussmen voluntarily lied by making a false report of a crime that triggered an unconstitutional criminal investigation.
It is proper that he lost the Danchenko case – 18 U 1001 is not to be weaponized against people. Not Danchenko, not Flynn. Not Van Der Zandt, not Papadoulis.
Regardless, BOTH prosecutions reveal in court that the FBI/DOJ KNEW the Steele Dossier and Alpoha Bank claims were a HOAX from the start.
That is specifically what the Jury found in acquitting Danchenko and Sussman.
You repeatedly Miss that point. BOTH Sussman and Danchenko ADMITTED LYING to the FBI. They BOTH ADMITTED the Steele Dossier and the Alpha nak scams were HOAXES. They were acquitted because the lies were not material – why weren’t they material ? Because the FBI already knew they were hoaxes.
“So, tell us, Turley, WHAT “alleged crimes” did Comey commit?”
18 USC 1983 – violation of the civil rights of others under color of law.
Perjury to the FISA court.
“Who’s to say what constitutes “sufficient evidence” to pursue a criminal investigation”
The constitution, the courts and the law – centuries of case law that defines in fairly great detail not only what is necessary to open an investigation but what is necescary to advance to the next level.
“and how does pursuing such an investigation constitute a crime? ”
Because agents of government violating the civil rights of citizens under color of law is a very serious crime.
Without which we have tyranny.
“How does a supposed “repeated failure of….leadership” constitute a crime”
That specifically is not a crime. It is still damning.
“and if so WHAT crime? You don’t say.”
AGAIN the violation of the civil rights of another under color of law.
This is how the police officers involved in the Rodney King case were ultimately convicted.
This is fairly common means by which Federal law enforcement prosecutes the abuses committed by state and local law enforcement.
The same law applies to Federal law enforcement. In fact it applies to all govenrment employees.
Similar law applies to private individuals. That is how the DOJ prosecuted members of the Clan in the south – for violating the Civil Rights of blacks.
It is a crime to deprive another person of their civil rights. It si a more significant crime when done by law enforcement.
“You are a law professor, and it’s this credential that you are trading on by making up nonexistent “crimes” based on the FBI pursuing a criminal investigation on allegedly insufficient evidence, and for an alleged “failure of leadership”. You know that both of these things are purely subjective, and no crime is involved. And, why are you doing these things? As a distraction away from Trump’s actual crimes, proof of which is in the public domain. It’s pathetic, Turley.”
Gigi – you are lost in space.
I cited specific law that Comey and others violated. Durham did not prosecute – because he would have lost in a DC court with DC judges and DC juries.
Also because it is extremely rare for prosecutors to prosecute prosecutors. I have little doubt that Comey’s conduct disgusts Durham.
It should disgust all of us. And it is Criminal. But no one was prosecuted as a result of the illegal conduct of the FBI found by the Church commission either.
Inarguably J. Edgar Hoover criminally abused his power – as did many under him and since.
Currently Wray – who is a pussy cat compared to Comey or Hoover has illegally failed to comply with a congressional subpeona.
We all know he will not be prosecuted.
Hunter will not serve a day in jail. Nor will Joe, nor those who covered up their crimes – particularly those in government.
Those who rigged the 2020 election will never be prosecuted.
But that does not change the fact that we have established a LONG list of Crimes over the past decade – by those inside our govenrment.
We have PROVEN the illegal interferance in US elections – by the FBI, the CIA, the DHS other alphabet agencies, and assorted government contractors and government funded NGO’s.
We have proven the collusion of – sometimes willingly and sometimes by force of social media.,
We have proven the fawning encouragement and participation in this election interferance by the MSM.
No one will be prosecuted – but it occured without ANY doubt.
He and all of his coconspirator’s belong in the DC Gulag INSTEAD of the Americans who were ushered into the Capitol by the Capitol police and most were taking SELFIES.
Blah, blah, blah, more Fox-purchased Turley BS. Notice the heading speaks of: “alleged violation of law”–did the disciples catch this distinction? Turley isn’t saying there ARE any violations of law–just allegations.Of course the disciples didn’t notice this catch. Here’s another gem, straight from the Republican playbook: ” The political weaponization of the criminal justice system was declared by Comey to be “a good day.”” Turley, there’s NO “weaponization” of the criminal justice system. The pig whose crimes you are paid to divert attention away from by attacking Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, and now, James Comey, is guilty as sin. The NY prosecution: Michael Cohen went to prison for 3 years for tax evasion and campaign finance violation over the hush-money payments to Stormy Daniels. Trump signed the checks. Cohen did these things to benefit Trump. There’s little room for doubt on that one. Then, in GA, there’s “I just need you to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have.” Multiple GA residents signed false Electoral College certificates saying Trump won, which he didn’t. They’re looking at felony convictions. How about this one: “They’re mine”; “if I take them they’re declassified because I had a standing order to declassify them” (referring to the classified documents Trump stole and then lied about returning. There was no standing order, and Trump was advised, long before he stole the documents, that there is a procedure for declassification, so he KNEW it cannot be done mentally, or by a standing order.
So, Turley until or unless you cop to the actual crimes Trump committed, evidence of which is in the public domain, you have no room to whine about “allegations” of crimes supposedly committed by Hunter Biden, Joe Biden or James Comey. When you do so anyway, admit it’s because you have been assigned the job of diverting attention away from Trump’s crimes by referring to “allegations” peddled by your employer.
Then let me say it – Comey is a walkjing talking violation of the law, and a case book example of abysmal ethics. This man should not be teaching anyone anything.
In any era were there was the slightest morality – Comey would be a pariah that no one would hire or talk to.
I find it odd that left wing nuts – who blamed him for tanking Clinton’s election now treat him as a saint because he can be relied on to piss all over Trump.
I would note that Comey’s highly questionable ethics were evident Long Before the collusion delusion or event he Clinton email scandal.
Comey has NEVER been an ethical person. Unfortunately that is increasingly the case with ranking people in government.
In prior era’s democrats and republicans would join in pitching these morally repugnant thugs.
Among the most damning allegations against those on the left today is their deification of morally bankrupt people like Comey.
If we were only so fortunate that Comey was the rare exception. Unfortunately he is not.
That you would defend him speaks incredibly poorly of YOUR ethics.
Nutacha is a tool for the liars on the left. Scroll by. Everything she spews is written in their talking points.
The classification, declassification and archiving of material is a function of the executive branch.
The legislative branch has no power to usurp the power of the executive branch.
No legislation that usurps the power of the executive branch and delivers that power to the legislative branch is constitutional.
Classified material is solely the purview of the President.
No president may commit crimes of subversion, espionage, treason or any other crimes against the United States using classified material.
So Republicans were able to view the 1023 alleging bribery of VP Joe Biden.
First the CHS is someone who was part of the Burisma deal. Someone who the FBI has used as a source for years.
Someone who the FBI has paid atleast 200K over the years for information and considers highly reliable.
Next the allegation is that VP Biden was paid $5M to get Shokin who was investigating Burisma fired.
Boy that first impeachment of Trump is starting to look pretty bad
The 1023 apears to go into a fair amount of detail of the negotiations involving the Biden’s and Burisma and Shokin as well as aparently discussions about Burisma purchasing another US energy company – as a means of protecting them against US political inquiries into their corruption.
The informant specifically identifies to the FBI the network of shell companies the Biden’s used to launder bribes.
And there are claims that records exist of the payment to VP Biden.
I would note that this information was all gathered by the FBI – in some instances during the Obama administration, but at the latest long before the 2020 election.
Long before Comer knew about the Biden shell company money laundering scheme.
So we have the FBI knowing for atleast 3 years – and possibly 7 years that there were detailed credible allegations of bribery invovlving VP Biden
And there is NO FBI investigation – no special counsel.
This is going to get very nasty for the left, for Joe – except of course that Joe does not remember any of this.
It is also really weird. The FBI has agreed to provide this document – so long as the House keeps it in the Capitol SCIF – that is despite the fact that it is NOT a classified document. So house members who have read it are free to tell us all what is in it.
In my view James Comey masquerades as a choir boy of Justice when he is proven hypocrite and liar whose incompetence adds to a lack of integrity and manic partiality favoriting his own views . I see this in virtually all his commentary and seemingly the motivation of his actions as well . If he teaches ethics it is another strike against blind adjudication of Justice .
From The Mueller Report:
Why Comey Was Fired
Rosenstein agreed to the memo but resisted any Russia reference. He knew as he left the White House that day that Comey would be fired — but not for the reasons he’d give in his document.
Rosenstein’s memo focused exclusively on Comey’s handling of the Clinton investigation, including his decision to publicly announce that she should not face charges. There was no mention of Russia, save for a single-page letter to Comey in which Trump said he’d been informed three times he wasn’t under investigation.
https://apnews.com/article/north-america-donald-trump-ap-top-news-criminal-investigations-james-comey-4ff1ecb621884a728b25e62661257ef0
Anderson Cooper interviewing Adolf Hitler: “Are you ever upset about the mean things people say about you?”
“Ethical leaders lead by seeing above the short term, above the urgent or the partisan, and with a higher loyalty to lasting values, most importantly the truth.”
I cannot believe he said that with a straight face.
And if he is trying to apply that to himself, he is either lying or delusional.
Comey, the DOJ, the FBI, MSM, the Biden admin, the Democrats, they are the real threats.
2024, no matter who is the candidate, vote Republican.
I know I am.
What do you think about RFK Jr.?
*he seems to love the Democrats .. . but I don’t think they love him back.
CNN and all the other “mainstream media “ lied for years about the Trump-Russian Conspiracy Theory as if it was fact. People continue to watch and read them because they do not admit to being wrong and will not report on the Twitter Files, the Durham Report, the congressional inquiries or they spin the reports to align with the state narrative.
Comey is a lying, corrupt sociopath who belongs in prison.
These people think the public are stupid, and they’re right.
FBI – FEDERAL BUREAU of INIQUITY
_______________________________
“[If Comey had indicted Hillary, Comey would have convicted Barack Obama.]”
– Andrew C McCarthy
_________________
He didn’t.
Comey corrupted and violated the law, Comey was criminally negligent and derelict in executing his duties, and Comey criminally corrupted and interceded in a U.S. presidential election.
Obama lied after he was complicit with Hillary in mishandling classified information through his employment of a pseudonymous e-mail account.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Obama’s Conflict Tanked the Clinton E-mail Investigation — As Predictedd
By Andrew C. McCarthy
September 26, 2016 8:00 AM
Hillary couldn’t be proven guilty without proving the president guilty as well.
‘How is this not classified?”
So exclaimed Hillary Clinton’s close aide and confidante, Huma Abedin. The FBI had just shown her an old e-mail exchange, over Clinton’s private account, between the then-secretary of state and a second person, whose name Abedin did not recognize. The FBI then did what the FBI is never supposed to do: The agents informed their interviewee (Abedin) of the identity of the second person. It was the president of the United States, Barack Obama, using a pseudonym to conduct communications over a non-secure e-mail system — something anyone with a high-level security clearance, such as Huma Abedin, would instantly realize was a major breach.
– National Review
CNN is a propaganda mill, indoctrination center, brainwashing facility and purveyor of lies and falsehoods adverse and deleterious to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, Americans, and the United States of America.
CNN promotes the campaigns of espionage, intervention in internal affairs, disinformation, misinformation, propaganda and indoctrination by adversarial, global, communist governments and individual globalists.
CNN engages “…in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
CNN commits constitutional treason.
CNN is a direct and mortal enemy of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, Americans and the United States of America.
Who watches CNN? You only see it in Dr’s. offices, train stations airline terminals or restaurants. No one watches it at home.
Defund the FBI
Defund the FBI, the CIA and the NSA. That way the people of this country will be safe and free from government intrusion in their lives.
The is literally no limit to how far CNN will go to protect one of their boys. Anderson Cooper refusing to ask Comey why he knowingly lied on three affidavits for FISA search warrants tells you everything you need to know. Lie and omit Brady material on an affidavit ? No problem. And no consequences for Comey either. Which is why he goes on friendly media outlets peacocking around like he answers to a “higher calling” or something. Jim Comey is a traitor. We used to know what to do with traitors in the United States. Sadly, not in today’s Amerika, and certainly not in Merrick Garland’s DOJ. Thank you, Jonathan, for an excellent article.
A traitor indeed.
James Comey, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton et al. have worked as hard as they could and “focused like a laser beam” on implementing the principles of communism and the principles of adversarial, foreign, communist governments in America.
James Comey et al. engaged “…in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort…,” aka treason.
James Comey et al. are direct and mortal enemies of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, Americans and the United States of America.
Fox does it too. There hasn’t been unbiased media since 1998.
What do you expect from Anderson Cooper? What a farce.
It was akin to interviewing Joseph Hazelwood on good maritime practices without mentioning the Exxon Valdez…says it all
The blatant hypocrisy, corruption, collusion and down right lying is an amazement to behold. What is even more amazing is how true Americans sit back and take it. There should be pitchforks and torches surrounding all prog/left politicians and media sycophants and chants to disinfect our government. Because I see little in the way of countering the obfuscations and grifting of the left I am resolved that we are getting the government that an apathetic self-absorbed populace deserves.
The blatant hypocrisy, corruption, collusion and down right lying is an amazement to behold.
What is even more amazing is how true Americans sit back and take it.
There should be pitchforks and torches surrounding all Republican theocrat politicians and media sycophants and chants to disinfect our government.
Because I see little in the way of countering the obfuscations and grifting of the Right I am resolved that we are getting the government that an apathetic self-absorbed populace deserves.
Cleaver but not based on fact but on brainwashing and koolaid consumption far beyond what is healthy for a functioning brain stem. Nice try but no sale.