The White House Refuses to Answer Questions About Audiotape on Hunter’s Foreign Dealings

In yesterday’s White House press briefing, there was an extraordinary moment when White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre refused to discuss a 2018 voicemail from President Biden that showed that the President lied repeatedly in denying ever speaking with Hunter Biden about his foreign business dealings. Jean-Pierre refused to answer a question from Fox News’ Peter Doocy and then refused again to answer a question from RealClearPolitics reporter Philip Wegmann. The rest of the press seemed content with an answer that was not just openly evasive but contemptful of the press.  It is continuing evidence of the success of the Biden campaign to get the media to maintain a false narrative that they helped create during the campaign.

As previously discussed, the recording clearly proves that President Biden has lied about his knowledge of these dealings. The audiotape of the President concerned a Times report on Dec. 12, 2018 detailing Hunter’s dealings with Ye Jianming, the head of CEFC China Energy Company. Ye was later arrested amid allegations of economic crimes.  Biden associates reportedly worked on the Times to change aspects of the story and President Biden appears to view that effort as successful.

The plan with the Bidens (which included Joe Biden’s brother) specified a proposed 10 percent share for Hunter for “the big guy.” According to Biden associate Tony Bobulinksi, that was a reference to Joe Biden.

The voicemail, discovered on Hunter’s discarded laptop, reveals that Joe Biden was following the stories of his son’s alleged influence peddling and specifically his Chinese dealings. In his message, Biden tells Hunter,

“Hey pal, it’s Dad. It’s 8:15 on Wednesday night. If you get a chance, just give me a call. Nothing urgent. I just wanted to talk to you. I thought the article released online, it’s going to be printed tomorrow in the Times, was good. I think you’re clear. And anyway if you get a chance, give me a call, I love you.”

Some of us have written for two years that Biden’s denial of knowledge is patently false. Indeed, it is baffling how Attorney General Garland can ignore the myriad of references to Joe Biden in refusing to appoint a special counsel.

Doocy asked the obvious question now that we have an actual audiotape of the President: “Why is there a voicemail of the president talking to his son about his overseas business dealings if the president has said he’s never spoken to his son about his overseas business dealings?”

Despite clearly contradicting the President, Jean-Pierre declared “Well, first I’ll say that what the president said stands. So if he — that’s what the president said, that is what stands.” Such an absurd response is only possible when you know that most of the media will go along with the evasion.

Doocy followed up “He’s leaving a voicemail about a New York Times article concerning Hunter Biden’s business dealings and he says, ‘I think you’re clear.’ How is that not him talking to his son about his overseas business dealings?”

Jean-Pierre then dismissed further questions, saying “We’re not, from this podium — I’m not going to talk about alleged materials from the laptop.”  When pressed again, she said  “I am not going to talk about alleged materials from the laptop. Peter, I refer you to his son’s representatives.”

She repeated that position with Wegmann who appeared the only other journalist even remotely interested in whether the President lied repeatedly about an influence peddling scheme run by his son.

Notably, neither reporter was looking for a response from Hunter or their representative. The tape captured President Biden’s voice not Hunter’s voice. Indeed, Hunter previously contradicted his own father and said that he did discuss dealings with his father.

There is no plausible reason why the President would not be willing to answer a question about his own statement captured on audiotape. He is not denying that it is his voice, which appears obvious. He simply will not answer a question about whether he lied during the campaign and repeatedly as president.

Again, this is only possible when you have the media in your pocket. Could you imagine if this was Trump caught on a tape and refusing to answer a question about the content. For example, the media has Trump’s call to Georgia officials on a virtual continual coverage loop.

I previously wrote a column on the one year anniversary of the Hunter Biden laptop story that marveled at the success of the Biden family in making the scandal vanish before that 2020 election. It was analogized to Houdini making his 10,000-pound elephant Jennie disappear in his act. The Biden trick however occurred live before an audience of millions. The value of involving the media in the original trick is that it invests reporters in the illusion. It is like calling audience members to the stage to assist in the performance. Reporters have to insist that there was nothing to see or they have to admit to being part of the deception.

The problem is that the media is now obviously concerned that the Democrats could lose the White House as well as Congress. They have begun to openly criticize Biden and even press him to clear the path for a successor. While recognizing the false narrative will be embarrassing, the Biden White House may be faced with a media more concerned with a possible GOP win in the coming elections. The risk is that journalists may decide to see the elephant.

122 thoughts on “The White House Refuses to Answer Questions About Audiotape on Hunter’s Foreign Dealings”

  1. You are saying a Special Counsel should be appointed to determine whether Biden lied (not under oath or anything) about discussions with his son at a time when he was out of office?

    I mean, if this is the standard for appointing special counsels there should be perhaps a dozen special counsel appointed each day to investigate Trump, who lied like 30,000 times while in office and continues that pace out of office. Certainly one thing he lied about often was Russia.

      1. It’s not worth the effort because Joe has the power to pardon his son for what could well be a very long list. He also has two brothers who no doubt are part of some of these shenanigans. Question is can Joe pardon himself and then step down?

  2. When I was young, Watergate became public and I watched as often as I could, read as much as I could. Even as a pimple faced kid, I knew something was up. I watched the main news channels ABC, CBS, and NBC with my parents. They were good back then. Something changed in the mid 1990s and news became a 24/7 monster that had to be constantly fed. The quality of reporting and reporters took as steady decline. The sensationalize the stories.

    I do not watch corporate or legacy news channels but choose rather to read books, blogs, podcasts and international news, papers periodically. I have followed this story off and on since It first broke. There is a mountain of information from the people in the Ukraine and other countries that had dealings with the Bidens who have gone on record. Bevan Cooney, Hunter’s former partner and now a prisoner released the password to his google account and gave access to 26,000 more emails, a good number of which deal with the Bidens. Tony Bobulinski, former Navy officer and CEO of Sinohawk was in business with the Bidens, testified, turned over his phones, emails, texts, and computers that corroborated his testimony that the Biden’s were dealing with the CCP and making millions. The book “Red Handed: How the American Elites Get Rich Helping China Win, devotes one chapter on the Biden’s dealings with China and the CCP and how they leveraged access to the Biden name, influence and access to the government. The author also goes after Republicans such as Mitch McConnell, Trent Lott and many others. There is a revolving door of government and military leaders retiring and being hired to help industry and foreign governments gain access to taxpayer funded deals.

    This is a scandal but bigger yet is how the legacy and corporate press walk lockstep in echoing the same script, same language and they suppress truth, hide it on from the headlines and attack anyone who dares dissent. Who is giving them their marching orders?

    Unlike Nixon, none of these politicians have any shame nor will they do the right thing, admit their mistakes and step aside from holding public office. I despised Nixon for decades, but as time marched on, I grew to respect that he had the decency to put the nation before his political ambition and resigned from public office. If only….

    The press secretary, members of this administration and the apologists in the media are full to the brim with bull excrement with regard to this story. Their deflections are obvious. What is fascinating is the irrationality of those who cannot open their eyes and ears. It would only be in utopia or Lala Land that people were told the raw truth, the actual truth, nothing but the truth (Liar, Liar). In the 21st Century, to the consumer of news and for the citizens the motto must be “Caveat Emptor!”

  3. Turley posts this article:

    https://nypost.com/2022/07/05/what-gwus-clarence-thomas-cancel-campaign-teaches-about-campus-intolerance/

    In which he laments:

    “The GW petition reflects a growing intolerance and orthodoxy sweeping universities. When I began teaching 30 years ago, universities were bastions of free speech where a wide array of views and values were steadfastly defended. Any attack on one was an attack on all.”

    Thirty years ago, there were no lying Trumpists. We attack liars like Joe Biden and Donald Trump (though there is no implied equivalence). Honest people- Liberal or Conservative- Democratic or Republican- should and must condemn liars. Turley refuses to acknowledge that we are dealing with liars who should and must be ignored- not censored- ignored and de-platformed. We are not talking about good faith views and values; we are talking about rage provocateurs like Alex Jones and lying Trumpists.

    1. What are you talking about? Turley is condemning Joe Biden’s lie. Multiple times JB said he had no discussions with Hunter about business dealings. That is a lie. We all knew it but the rage you are talking about generated by 4 years of lies about Laptops being russian disinfo., Gen Flynn, pee tapes, fake DNC dossiers, covid hysteria, etc. allowed otherwise rational people to vote for an incompetent politician who spent months campaigning from his basement because he has a difficult time putting together a cogent sentence without a teleprompter. Tell me the good faith view and values that allowed you to vote based on rage.

  4. Even if JT improved his posts to actually explain and show proof that Biden repeatedly lied about not discussing Hunter’s business dealings with his son
    (no statements are provided to compare), I think that without anything else would only be politically significant and not legally significant.

    1. You also believe the “fake” “decision” by the “Texas Supreme Court,” in 1869, finding that secession is unconstitutional, carries some weight and force.

      Of course, it does not.

      That decision is patently more erroneous and juridically egregious than the preposterous decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973, which decided for Roe as a constitutional right.

      The correct fundamental law on abortion was revealed and implemented by the Supreme Court, and the correct fundamental law on secession must be decided and implemented by the Supreme Court, for history, for the present, for the future of the Constitution and for the future of actual America.

      Beginning with the illicit denial of secession, Lincoln’s acts must be found as unconstitutional and illegitimate today as they were in 1860, if America intends to be a solemn and earnest nation of laws.

    2. If that’s really your complaint about Turley, let me google that for you.

      Here you go. USAToday (News, not opinion section) in 2019.

      DES MOINES, Iowa — Former Vice President Joe Biden said Saturday he hasn’t spoken to his son Hunter Biden about his overseas businesses while forcefully calling again for an investigation into President Donald Trump’s July phone call with Ukraine’s president.

      “I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings,” Biden said. “Here’s what I know. Trump should be investigated.”
      —-
      Interestingly, Hunter contradicts his dad on that point in the same article.

      —-

      Hunter Biden, however, told the New Yorker in an interview for an article published in July that he discussed Burisma, the Ukrainian natural gas producer, with his father in December 2015. At the time, Hunter Biden sat on Burisma‘s board of directors.

      Around the time of the conversation, Biden was preparing for a trip to the Ukraine and the Obama administration special envoy had raised the issue with the Vice President, according to the article. Hunter Biden told the New Yorker he and his father spoke about Burisma just once.

      https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2019/09/21/joe-biden-never-talked-ukraine-son-trump-needs-investigated/2401830001/

      USA Today too right wing for you? Here’s DailyBeast reporting on same.

      https://www.thedailybeast.com/joe-biden-ive-never-spoken-to-my-son-about-ukraine-business-deals

  5. To the Anonymous chap who continues to reply to me to no avail, I suggest you email Turley about Darren/Wordpress censoring you. I have received 4 comments from you which do not appear on this blog.

    If you want me to complain to Turley on your behalf, I need to get paid! I don’t work pro bono. I don’t know all the facts of your situation. I wish I could hear your case. Unfortunately, I would not be able to get Darren’s side of the story because, like Turley, he ain’t talking short of being subpoenaed….

  6. I’m not on Twitter so I have to look up his tweets on ResIpsaLoquitur. Turley often makes comments there which he will not elaborate here. I need to to remind myself to review his tweets before I unfairly accuse him of anything! I do try to be fair-minded which explains why I defend him at times as well as to insist that he is a NeverTrumper.

  7. President Magoo strikes again. Here in Richmond two illegals were picked up plotting to shoot up a Fourth of July Celebration at Dogwood Dell and the Diamond. Unvetted border crossers creating havoc. Who could have predicted that? Biden is our punishment for throwing out values and replacing them with sentimental stupidity. I want that guy out or we’ll be.

    1. General Antonio de Padua María Severino López de Santa Anna y Pérez de Lebrón’s Revenge!

  8. Dennis,

    As much as I condemn Turley for being a hypocritical sell-out, I must come to his defense here. He does not wear his religion on his sleeve. I’m not aware that he is a religious person, correct me if I am wrong. He married a Jewish woman, and he once indicated that his family celebrates both religions. His wife, therefore, is not an observant Jew, but a liberal one, and thus it stands to reason that Turley is likewise not devoutly religious. Accordingly, I doubt your claim that Turley is concerned about his faith’s view on abortion. Given his intelligence and rationality, I suspect that he is agnostic or atheistic like George Will, for instance.

    Turley does not buy into the paranoid delusions of Trumpists, e.g., the “Deep State.” People of faith who believe in the myth of a god are prone to Trumpist delusions. They are also gullible enough to believe in alien U.F.O’s, the reporting on which has become a regular feature on Tucker Carlson’s Fox show! I’m not aware that Turley swallows any of this nonsense.

    I agree, however, that Turley does ignore stories that spell trouble for Trump while delighting in reporting any news involving Hunter/Joe Biden. I happen to agree with him that Biden has a lot of explaining to do even if it may not prove to be criminal.

    Let’s not be too hard on him. While he does point out shortcomings in the Jan 6 committee, he has stated that he supports it. Moreover, he does not dispute the damning nature of Hutchinson’s narrative in spite of its one-sidedness. If you ever watch Fox primetime or Newsmax, you will hear a very different narrative as evidenced daily by the lying Trumpists here. Turley rarely appears on Fox primetime because his views are not sufficiently Trumpist. It seems that he is appearing mostly on the afternoon news programs instead of the rage-filled opinion shows.

    Turley certainly does not think death threats are ok; he need not condemn them publicly because it goes without saying that they are hideous. True, he has not commented about the claims of witness tampering, but here, too, no one would support that. Trumpists tamper with witnesses AFTER they have testified by accusing them of TDS or being a RINO- neither of which Turley has EVER stooped to do which is why I consider a NeverTrumper.

  9. Jonathan: This comment is not for you so relax. It’s directed to your loyal followers. Dear Loyal Followers: Pay attention closely. Notice that Professor Turley always dredges up the old, very old alleged “scandal” about Hunter Biden and his dad when he doesn’t want to address other important issues. Now it’s apparently because Joe “lied” about knowing what his son was up to in his business ventures. Notice that if the professor thought Hunter or his dad had engaged in any crime he would have mentioned it long ago. The Hunter Biden thing is a complete distraction. Turley is doing this because one of his jobs is to echo Rupert Murdock’s talking point of the day– to distract Fox viewers from the real important threats to our Democracy going on around us. So are here just two of the issues Turley should be discussing:

    1. Clarence Thomas and the Supreme Court. More than a million Americans have signed a petition calling for the impeachment of the longest serving Justice. Do you remember that happening in the history of the Court? Thomas helped lead the brigade that overturned Roe that overturned almost 50 years of Court precedent. Now, Thomas has his sights on other personal rights–like the right to contraception, the right to marry whomever we choose, etc. Is it any wonder the Court’s approval rating has reversed since only 2 years ago? The American people don’t think the Court is supporting fundamental constitutional rights. But Turley thinks the states are better suited to protect rights. Really? South Dakota’s Gov. Kristi Noem, whose state has criminalized abortion, thinks that even a 10 yr old rape victim should be forced to carry the fetus. Think about that for a moment. If you have a 10 yr old who was raped would you want her to be forced to bare a child–and to have to raise the baby without being able to go to school? Noem doesn’t pledge to provide for pre and post natal care or child care while the mother attends school. That’s not in the state budget. But this is what is happening around the country–thanks to Clarence Thomas. Do you hear Turley talk about the dire consequences from this scenario or the fact that women are facing jail time for seeking an abortion in another state? Nope. Turley apparently thinks that’s just fine and dandy because, well, his faith tells him abortion is a “sin”.

    2. Jan. 6 Committee hearings. Turley has written 2 columns about the hearings–mainly trying to discredit the testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson. He doesn’t want to discuss all the death threats Hutchinson and other witnesses have received. Nor the threats Committee members have received. Adam Kinzinger, a GOP member of the Committee, says he has received numerous death threats, not only directed at him but his family. In one call, a person threatened to come to Kinzinger’s house and go after his wife and newborn baby. One person said in a Tweet directed at his wife: “That pimp you married not only broke his oath, he sold his soul. Therefore, although it might take some time, he will be executed”. Now I know some of you out there don’t like what the Jan. 6 Committee is doing. That’s OK. But is it OK to threaten witnesses? Witness tampering is a crime! This is serious stuff. As a lawyer and legal analyst you would think Turley would be outraged about these threats to the criminal justice system. Apparently not. He would rather talk about Hunter Biden and his dad. Any one out there have other important subjects to discuss that Turley refuses to address?

    1. Dennis, honey, have you noticed yet, that other than Fox News, “the mainstream media” are 24/7 laser focused on Trump and J6 and Republicans and Ginni T? Have you noticed that Turley is one of the very FEW actually reporting/commenting on/bringing attention to the CURRENT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and his highly concering and questionable foreign business activities that may actually constitute TREASON because he is bought and paid for by foreign enemies? WTH is the matter with you?

    2. ‘Things we’ve recently learned about Hunter Biden:

      – Joe gave him money that he used for a Russian prostitution ring
      – Joe spoke to him on a voicemail about his overseas business dealings
      – Joe sold America’s oil reserves to a Chinese company Hunter has financial ties to.’

      ———————————————–

      ‘Confirmed:

      The Biden administration sold one million barrels from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to a Chinese communist oil company, known as Sinopec. Hunter Biden, is tied to Sinopec. In 2015, a private equity firm he cofounded bought a $1.7 billion stake in Sinopec.’

  10. I posted these questions to Smith’s comment some 40 minutes ago:

    “Darren Smith exclaims:

    “Pack of liars”

    To whom were you referring? Trumpists or Bidenists or both?”
    ——————-

    I got a notice that Anonymous replied to my comment:

    “JT should have a neutral moderator.”

    When I clicked on it, it would not take me to that comment so that I could reply. I now see that the comment does not appear on the timeline as if it had been taken down by the moderator Smith.

    That comment clearly does NOT violate Turley’s civility rule. Should I not report Darren to Turley for censoring this person’s speech?

      1. David,

        I got another notice of a comment which began:

        “Give some people a little bit of power and eventually they will abuse it.”

        Now, if WordPress is banning this guy, why do I get a notice of his comment, but I get an error message when I click to see the entire post?

        Either Smith is removing these comments or WordPress is allowing me to get notice of a comment which I am not able to see in its entirety!

        1. Because Anonymous the Stupid uses more than one email account under the anonymous alias and sometimes intentionally uses the email he knows will likely be censored. When he wants his post to remain he uses a different email. That is why only some of his posts are censored. Anonymous the Stupid has control over the email address he uses.

          1. This Anonymous crapola has got to stop! You would think that a serious academic would want to restrict people from “fouling the footpath” by acting anonymously. It’s a shame that Turley is not embarrassed by the shenanigans that go on around here. I suspect he threw in the towel long ago in hopes of cleaning up his forum.

      2. David,

        I got a 3rd notice of a comment from the same anonymous person who stated that Turley should be notified about his comments being banned. Again, his comment is not posted here.

        Are you familiar enough with how WordPress operates to know that a person banned by Darren should still be able to communicate with someone who is not banned? I would think that the comments of a banned person should not appear to someone who is not banned!

        Please advise.

      3. This has happened to me several times, for comments that would be hard to label uncivil etc. (of course, that is my own opinion, from the baseline comment content I see here daily). Sometimes I can’t even log in to be able to make a comment, then a day or so later, no problem. WordPress software can be kind of clunky, I think.

  11. Natacha says:

    “And, of course, Turley gets to call Biden a liar.”

    Yes, I noted that Turley called Biden a “liar.” Several times.

    Admittedly, Turley long ago called Trump a “carnival snake charmer” which is tantamount to a liar. Since then he has noted his misstatements and false narratives, but unless I am mistaken, he has never accused Trump of “lying” per se. Even with regard to the Big Lie, Turley has never conceded it was made in bad faith. He will only acknowledge that Democrats believe that Trump was lying about election fraud. In fact, he has made the point that a large percentage of Republicans believe there was fraud as if to suggest that legitimates the false belief!

    Now, I have been consistent in not opposing any effort to expose criminal conduct on the part of Hunter of Joe. Since I don’t believe that even presidents are above the law, I could not care less if the DOJ appoints a special prosecutor to investigate the Bidens. Do it!

    My beef is Turley’s painfully obvious bias in never overlooking any news about the Hunter scandal while either ignoring or pooh-poohing developments in the Trump scandal, e.g., the recent subpoenas against Graham and Trump lawyers involved in Trump’s phone call to Raffensperger of Georgia to find so many votes. I attribute this bias, of course, to his employment at Fox News. Money makes people do things they ought not to do. Sadly, Turley is no exception.

    1. Biden is a liar. Biden is a known liar with a history of lying. Biden is a liar. Biden has always been a liar. WTH is the matter with you people? BIDEN IS A LIAR. There is NO DEFENSE. Biden IS a liar.

        1. Biden has always been a liar, and he continues lying through his fake teeth to this very day. “I never once spoke to my son or my brother about their business dealings.” FLATOUT LIE. The list of Biden lies is very long.

          Trump is a charmer. Trump is a persuader. Trump is a businessman. Trump is a salesman. Trump did what he said he would do. Trump kept his campaign promises more so than any other president in history. Trump is the greatest president in our lifetime. Lady Melania is one of the kindest, most elegant, stylish, beautiful inside and out, first ladies ever.

          Biden is a piece of political filth. So is his wife. So is his entire filthy corrupt family.

            1. No, Good Anonymous strikes again.

              Trump is a charmer, a persuader, a get-things-done-problem-solver who loves this country. Biden is a lazy, pathological, delusional liar and sellout.

              IMPEACH Biden
              IMPEACH Garland
              IMPEACH Mayorkas

        2. Trump never needed cue cards to tell him to SIT DOWN at meetings.

          The current leader of the free world does not know what to do or say unless a cue card tells him to. Biden is a delusional liar. America has never been more unsafe than we are now with the illegitmate occupier of the Oval Office whose entire family is for sale and bought off by China. Joe Biden is a sellout who sold his country to the highest bidder to enrich his filthy family. He is a treasonous traitor to this country. Without question he must be impeached, convicted and removed from office for his crimes.

  12. Congrats! So when you proposed, i guess your spouse didn’t say “I refuse to comment”. Gave an actual answer (and the right one!).

  13. We’ll, It stands that Hunter and his Sister are the representation of how the Biden’s raised their Kids,
    So It comes as no surprise that the Country is now dysfunctional and in utter chaos (The Biden White Household).

  14. “The Biden family has done five deals in China totaling some $31 million arranged by individuals with direct ties to Chinese intelligence — some reaching the very top of China’s spy agency,” the New York Post reported in January.

    “Indeed, every known deal that the Biden family enjoyed with Beijing was reached courtesy of individuals with spy ties. And Joe Biden personally benefited from his family’s foreign deals,” the Post continued.
    https://www.westernjournal.com/looking-like-trump-right-report-says-hunter-biden-fed-surveillance-china-ties/?

    Ah, nothing to see here, move along.

    1. To me, this is obvious: the prime purpose of the US giving high grade military weapons to Ukraine (I’ll take any odds on a bet that some of these weapons shall later kill Americans and/or persons doing the bidding of the US, if that has not already happened; reports state some of the weapons are now for sale on the dark net) and supporting the war is to make free money/profits for the MIC such as Raytheon (note that the current Sec. of War (wrongly called “Defense”) is the ex-Raytheon CEO.)

      The corrupt Ukrainian energy company Burisma in league with the Ukranian government paid the Biden Krime Syndikat multiple millions of dollars (they paid Hunter while his entire life comprised screwing his sister in law, the raunchiest whores extant, drinking hard liquor and ingesting hard felonious controlled substances 24/7.)

      The current war is a simple deal where 10+k civilian Ukrainian war deaths enrich the MIC to the tune of billions of dollars in weapons profits. IOW this is just another banker’s war like every other. Anyone who disagrees calls US Marine Lt. Col. Smedley Butler a liar, who in his era was the all time most decorated Marine, who fought valiantly in several wars and later repented and claimed to his death that, “All wars are banker’s wars.”

    2. NY Post? Rupert Murdoch, who also owns Fox, owns the NY Post. You are correct. Nothing to see here.

  15. Seems members of this administration are either crooks, liars or perverts. Oh yes, or idiots.

    1. Darren Smith exclaims:

      “Pack of liars”

      To whom were you referring? Trumpists or Bidenists or both?

  16. The embarrassing actions of so corrupt a political ideology as the dimdems are in open and full view and, tragically, our education/media industry has created generations incapable of even noting this predicament, much less feeling any urgent concern. We would be far better served by Caligula’s horse as our Senate majority leader than chuck schumer. H*ll, we would be far better served with Nero as our leader than the sack of mis-firing synapses that we have now.

  17. Yet another iteration of the “Hunter Biden Scandal” diversion to mollify and keep the disciples fired up so they’ll ignore the big political story, which is Giuliani and others getting subpoenaed to appear before a Georgia grand jury and testify about efforts to steal Biden votes and given them to Trump.. And it was, of course, yet another attack on mainstream media and an effort to validate “Douchie” as something other than another Fox political hack. And, of course, Turley gets to call Biden a liar. NO ONE CARES about this fake “scandal”, other than your employer, Turley, which is why no one tries to hammer Biden. There’s no evidence of any crime here, and we know that if there were, Turley, as a paid mouthpiece willing to stretch the facts to fit the conclusion, would be all over it. So why should Merrick Garland waste resources investigating a matter for which there is no obvious evidence of any crime just so Fox can have some story to counter the story about real political criminals: Trump and his crones and their efforts to pressure and bully local election officials to invalidate votes for Biden.

    1. Russia, Russia, Russia. Abortion, Abortion, Abortion. The day the Big Guy took over a gallon of gasoline was $2.39. Enough said.

    2. IMPEACH Joe Biden
      IMPEACH Merrick Garland
      IMPEACH Alejandro Mayorkas
      IMPEACH IMPEACH IMPEACH

    3. Joe Biden is the least popular president in modern history! So is his horrid wife.
      The Biden administration is one of the most anti-American, corrupt, and incompetent in history!
      Over 80% of Americans believe that our country is in serious decline! Because it is!
      Most Americans are waking up to the FACT that Biden is INTENTIONALLY driving the country off a cliff!

Leave a Reply